ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NIIT LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal. It noted that the CBDT circular revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to the ITAT and that such circulars are binding on tax authorities.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order allowing partial relief on an addition. The assessee argued that the appeal was not maintainable due to the tax effect being below the monetary limit set by a CBDT circular.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeal is maintainable before the ITAT considering the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI
Before: SMT DIVA SINGH & SH.O.P.KANT
Date of Hearing 09.03.2016 Date of Pronouncement 22.03.2016 ORDER
PER DIVA SINGH, JM
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue assailing the correctness of the order dated 01.08.2012 of CIT(A)-XXXII, Delhi pertaining to 2008 –09 assessment year on the following ground: – 1. “That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in law and on facts of the case in allowing relief of Rs.11,03,494/- out of total addition of Rs.11,55,150/-.”
Ms. Bhavita Kumar, Advocate present on behalf of the assessee inviting attention to the CBDT latest circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 submitted that the departmental appeal is not maintainable in view of the fact that the tax effect involved is much less than the limit fix therein of Rs. 10 Lacs of the ITAT. Ld. CIT DR, Smt. P. M.Biswas considering the CBDT circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th December fairly submitted that the tax effect involved is much less than Rs. 10 Lacs.
I.T.A .No.-5359/Del/2012
We have heard the submissions of the parties on this issue and perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide the aforesaid Circular dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limit to Rs.10 lakh for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Para 3 of the aforesaid Circular has been made applicable vide para 10 retrospectively. Considering the settled legal precedent that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are binding on the authorities, we dismiss the departmental appeal considering the material available on record.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 22nd March, 2016.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026