ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. MANDEEP SINGH BAWEJA, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, citing a CBDT circular that revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to the ITAT to Rs. 10 lakh. This circular was made applicable retrospectively.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order allowing a revised computation and relief of Rs. 10,00,000/-. The appeal was filed despite the tax effect being less than Rs. 10 lakh.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable given the revised monetary limits for appeals and the tax effect involved. The applicability of CBDT circulars to pending appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI
Before: SMT DIVA SINGH & SH.O.P.KANT
Date of Hearing 23.02.2016 Date of Pronouncement 28.03.2016 ORDER
PER DIVA SINGH, JM
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue assailing the correctness of the order dated 30.04.2013 of CIT(A)-XXX, New Delhi pertaining to 2009-10 assessment year on the following grounds:
– 1. “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in :- (a) Directing the AO to accept revised computation & allow relief of Rs.10,00,000/- by ignoring the provision of section 139(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant craves the right to alter, amend, add or substitute the ground of appeal.”
2. Considering the amount at stake for the Revenue, both the parties were required to address Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT. Considering the same in the facts on record, the Ld. Sr. DR fairly conceded that the departmental appeal has been filed wherein the tax effect involved is much less than Rs.10 lakh.
I.T.A .No.-4154/Del/2013
More judgments on Section 139(5)
- R S Industech Private Limited, Gandhidham vs ITO Ward-2, GandhidhamITA 843/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 439/AGR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 438/AGR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 439/AGR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Preeti Dubey, Jhansi vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(5), JhansiITA 438/AGR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026