TAXI OPERATORS UNION RAILWAY STATION JAMMU,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3) JAMMU AAYKAR BHAWAN RAIL HEAD COMPLEX PANAMA CHOWK JAMMU, JAMMU
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal condoned the delay, admitted the appeal, and set aside the CIT(A)'s order. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment, granting the assessee another opportunity to present its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Taxi Operators Union, challenged an assessment order where an addition of Rs. 39.80 Lacs was made for cash deposits under a best judgment assessment. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition. The assessee sought condonation of a 240-day delay in filing the appeal, citing changes in union administration.
What were the issues?
The key legal issues were the condonation of delay in filing the appeal and the validity of the best judgment assessment and the addition made for cash deposits without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA, JM
(िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Taxi Operators Union ITO Ward –1(3) Railway Station (Jammu) Aaykar Bhawan बनाम/ C/o Shri P.N. Arora (Advocate) Rail head complex Vs. 3rd Floor, SRK Mall, 14-Kennedy Avenue Panama Chowk Mall Road, Amritsar (Punjab)-143001 Jammu - 180012 �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AABAT-4171-F (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. P. N. Arora (Advocate)- Ld. AR ��थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Sh. Charan Dass (Addl. CIT) - Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 02-02-2026 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement 03-02-2026 : आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012- 13 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC dated 29-05-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. AO u/s 144 / 147 on 03-12-2019.
The registry has noted delay of 240 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by the Assessee on the
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026