GLOBAL INDIA HOSPITALITY SERVICES P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 8(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) as it was reasoned and the assessee failed to provide any contradictory material. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.
What were the facts?
During a survey, unaccounted sales of Rs. 71.17 lakhs were found for the assessee, a hospitality business. The AO added the entire amount, but the CIT(A) restricted it to 4% of unaccounted sales. The ITAT set aside the order, and in set aside proceedings, the CIT(A) confirmed an addition of Rs. 26.45 lakhs based on average gross profit.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition made by the CIT(A) based on average gross profit in set aside proceedings is justified when the assessee failed to provide any contradictory evidence.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Pawan Singh
O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran (AM) :-
The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by learned CIT(A)- 16, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment year 2006-07. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite service of notice by registered post and hence we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-party, without the presence of the assessee.
The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Learned CIT(A) in partially confirming addition to the tune of Rs.26.45 lakhs out of the addition of Rs.71.17 lakhs made by the AO.
We heard learned DR and perused the record. We notice that the learned CIT(A) has passed this order in the set aside proceedings consequent to the order passed by ITAT in dated 19.12.2012.
2 M/s. Global India Hospitality Service Pvt. Ltd.
The assessee is hospitality business. The assessee was subjected to a survey operation and it was found that the assessee has not accounted Sales invoices to the tune of Rs. 71. 17 lakhs. The assessing officer added the entire amount to the total income of the assessee. The CIT(A), in the first round of proceedings, restricted the addition to 4% of the unaccounted sales, i.e., at the rate of net profit declared by the assessee. The Tribunal, however, set aside the order of learned CIT (A) and restored the matter to his file by making certain observations about the Gross profit rate. Accordingly, in the set aside proceedings, the learned CIT(A) worked out average gross profit of three years, excluding the year under consideration. The Ld CIT(A) adopted the said rate and worked out the Gross profit and also find the difference between the same and the amount declared by the assessee. The same resulted in a difference of Rs.26.45 lakhs and the Ld CIT(A) confirmed the addition to that extent. Still aggrieved, the assessee has filed this appeal before us.
We notice that the Leonard CIT(A) has passed a reasoned order by considering the facts available on record. Further, we notice that the assessee has not filed any material before us to contradict his findings. Accordingly we confirm the order passed by first appellate authority
In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order has been pronounced in the Court on 13.7.2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026