PRABHAT R. JHUNJHUNWALA,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT RG 16(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order and restored the matter to the CIT(A)'s file. The CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate the appeal afresh after providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed a penalty order confirmed by the CIT(A). The CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without hearing the assessee, who claimed non-receipt of notice due to family disputes.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM)
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 12-03-2015 passed by Ld CIT(A)-30, Mumbai confirming the penalty of Rs.6,94,670/- levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.
The authorised representative of the assessee has moved an application seeking adjournment. However, on perusal of the order passed by Ld CIT(A), I notice that the Ld CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order, i.e., without hearing the assessee. The assessee has filed Statement of Facts before the Tribunal, wherein it was stated that the assessee did not receive the notice of hearing sent by Ld CIT(A) on the reasoning that there was dispute between the family members.
Hence I proposed to restore all the matters to the file of Ld CIT(A), since the first appellate authority has passed the ex-parte order without hearing the assessee and since the assessee has plausible given reason for not appearing before the Ld CIT(A). The Ld D.R did not object to the same. Accordingly I set aside the order passed by Ld CIT(A) and restore all the matters to his file with the direction to adjudicate the appeal afresh, after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed. Order has been pronounced in the Court on 1.8.2016
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026