ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S FAB FININVEST (INDIA) LTD, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2047/DEL/2010Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 April 2016AY 2007-083 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's adjournment application. Citing CBDT Circular No. 21/2015 and Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal in limini.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the assessee's order. The Revenue sought an adjournment for the hearing. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 10 Lakhs.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed based on the tax effect and CBDT circulars when an adjournment is sought.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY & SMT SUCHITRA KAMBLE

Hearing: 25.04.2016Pronounced: 25.04.2016

PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM

1.

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. The Revenue sought an adjournment by way of an application. But the Ld. AR pointed that the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs. 10 Lakhs. Therefore, the application for adjournment is rejected.

2.

In terms of CBDT Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December,2015, F.No. 279/Misc./142/2007-ITJ(Pt.) read with S.268 A of the Income Tax Act 1961, this appeal by the Revenue should have been withdrawn or should not be pressed by the Revenue. In view of the above this appeal by the Revenue is dismissed in limini.

3.

In the result Revenue’s appeal is dismissed in limini.

Order pronounced in the Open Court On 25th April, 2016.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →