M/S. PRACHIN SHANI DEV MANDIR SEWA SAMITI,GHAZIABAD vs. CIT, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred in rejecting the application. The society's activities of maintaining a temple and Ghat for public religious rituals are charitable in nature and fall under general public utility. The CIT overlooked evidence of the society's efforts and recommendations from authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act to run and maintain an old Shani Mandir and its associated Ghat. The CIT rejected the application, stating the society lacked authorization and its activities were not genuine.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AA based on the lack of formal authorization for maintaining a temple and Ghat, and whether the society's activities qualified as charitable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY & SMT SUCHITRA KAMBLE
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 25/08/2014 passed by Ld. CIT Ghaziabad u/s 12AA.
The grounds of appeal are as follows:-
“1. That the Ld. CIT, Ghaziabad erred in law as well as on the facts by rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act on the ground that the report of ACIT, Range-1 Ghaziabad could not rectify the activities and affairs of the society as genuine.
2. That the Ld. CIT, Ghaziabad erred in law as well as on the facts by rejecting the registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act even after verifying the affairs and activities of the society and also verifying the books of account and vouchers for the previous years.
3. That the Ld. CIT, Ghaziabad erred in law and facts in rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act that authorization to the society too maintain or construct the temples or Ghats by any authority could not be produced while there is no such requirement prescribed under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Ground No. 4 to 7 remains the same.
The appellant is a Society which was incorporated on 13/7/2010. The main object of the Society is to run and maintain Old Shani Mandir situated at the bank of Gang Nahar at Muradnagar, Ghaziabad. There was an investment in development of Ghat and related building of Rs.63,000/- and most of these expenses were incurred in cash. The first application for registration u/s 12A was rejected vide order dated 31/3/2013 on the ground that the objective of the Society is general in nature and is not covered u/s 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT has asked the Society to ascertain the affairs and activities of the Society. The CIT in its order held that Society does not have any authorization or legal rights to run and maintain the Old Shani Mandir situated at the bank of Gang Nahar, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad or to execute any construction of this side. The Society produces letters written by it to District Magistrate of Ghaziabad Development Authority and the Police Department for the maintenance of the Ghats and Temples. The CIT observed that there was no permission letter or any other evidence regarding authorization to Society to maintain or construct the Temple or Ghats by any of the authority. Therefore, the CIT rejected the application for grant of Registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act.
The Ld. AR submitted that there was a letter dated 5/5/2015 from the Ghaziabad Development Authority recommending that the maintenance of the Ghats and Temple be given to the Society. The same was ignored by the CIT. The CIT also ignored the balance- sheet of the Society wherein investment in development of Ghat was shown in the balance-sheet as on 31/3/2011.
The Ld. DR relied upon the order of the CIT(A).
We have perused all the records and heard both the counsels. The main objective of the assessee was to run and maintain old Shani Mandir on the bank of Gang Nahar. The devotees normally take bath at the bank of the river. As the temple is next to the banks of the river, it was a necessity to build a Ghat or to maintain the Ghat situated therein because, public come for religious rituals. Thus, the activities of the society are charitable in nature and fall within the category of advancement of any other object of general Public utility. The CIT is wrong in coming to a conclusion that the activities of the society are not charitable as it does not have permission. The CIT ignored a letter dated 5/5/2015 from the Ghaziabad Development Authority recommending the Society as well as the balance-sheet of the Society wherein investment in development of Ghat was shown. Letters to the District administration are ignored by the CIT. The CIT has not stated what are the permission that the assessee is required to get and what it did not get. No rules or regulations are quoted. No authority has objected or held that the activity of the trust is illegal or unauthorized. The fact remains that, the Public Utility is developed and maintained by the assessee. Therefore, the rejection by the CIT regarding the application u/s 12AA is not correct. Hence, we direct the CIT to grant registration to the assessee under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961
In result, appeal is allowed.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 26th of April, 2016.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026