EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF LATE BOMAN MANECKJI MIRZA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the executors are entitled to the TDS credit deducted on the deceased's PAN, provided no return was filed by the deceased claiming the same. For the assessment year 2023-24, the income is to be taxed at normal slab rates applicable to an individual.
What were the facts?
The assessee, executors of a deceased individual's estate, were issued a new PAN after the deceased's death. They claimed TDS credit deducted on the deceased's old PAN for income earned by the estate, but the tax department denied this credit.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS credit deducted on a deceased individual's PAN can be claimed by the executors of their estate. Whether income of a deceased person's estate should be taxed at maximum marginal rate or normal slab rates.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA
PER K. NARASIMHA CHARY, J.M: Aggrieved by the orders dated 14/03/2024, 22/03/2024 and 28/03/2024 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (“Ld. CIT(A)”), Kolkata in the case of Executors of the Estate of Late Boman Maneckji Mirza (“the assessee”) for the assessment year 2021-22, 2022-23 and 2023-24 respectively, assessee preferred these appeals. Since the substantial issue involved in these appeals is common, these appeals are clubbed, heard together and a common order is being passed for the sake of conveni
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 168
- Estate of Late Rajen Krishnalal Shah, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 34(1)(1), MumbaiITA 4273/MUM/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed4 Aug 2026AY 2025-2026
- Choksi Subhdraben Chhotalal, Surat vs Ward 2(2)(1), SuratITA 585/SRT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
- Choksi Subhdraben Chhotalal, Surat vs Ward 2(2)(1), SuratITA 576/SRT/2026[2009-10]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2009-10
- Estate of Vasant J Patki, Mumbai vs DCIT 24.1, MumbaiITA 8971/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Jun 2026AY 2023-24
- Estate of Pallonji Shapoorji Mistry, Mumbai vs Deputy Director of Income Tax, BengaluruITA 9185/MUM/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed26 Mar 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026