← Back to search

ITO, ROHTAK vs. RAJENDER, MEHAM

PDF
ITA 6057/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 October 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Sh. Naveen Kumar Goyal, CA
For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 30.10.2025Pronounced: 30.10.2025

This Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2019-20, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No.
ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079382727(1) dated 07.08.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges at the outset that the Revenue's instant appeal involves tax effect of Rs.21,51,500/- which is less than the minimum tax effect prescribed of Rs.60 lakhs in the CBDT latest Circular No. 9/2024, dated 17.09.2024. 4. Learned Departmental Representative is indeed very fair in not disputing the fact that the CBDT's foregoing tax effect Rajender

2
circular has been made applicable with retrospective effect on all pending appeals as well. I thus reject the Revenue's instant appeal for this precise reason subject to all just exceptions.

5.

This Revenue's appeal is dismissed in above terms. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 30/10/2025. (Satbeer Singh Godara)

Judicial Member

Dated: 30/10/2025
*Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*

ITO, ROHTAK vs RAJENDER, MEHAM | BharatTax