THE GUDIVADA CO-OP URBAN BANK LIMITED,GUDIVADA vs. ASSITANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee, being an Urban Cooperative Bank, was not restricted by the RBI circular that prohibited District Central Cooperative Banks from accepting SBNs. Therefore, the cash deposits were valid.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Cooperative Bank, deposited Rs. 4,68,39,000/- in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated this amount as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits in SBNs made by an Urban Cooperative Bank during demonetization are to be treated as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, and if the RBI circular applies to such banks.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative [DR] relied on the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities.
We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record as well as the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities. Admittedly, the assessee has accepted the cash in the form of SBNs during the demonetization period and has 6 deposited the same into the bank accounts of the assessee. There is merit in the argument of the Ld. AR where the Circular cited by the Ld. AR clearly states that only District Cooperative Central Banks (DCCB) are not allowed to extend the exchange facility against the SBNs from 14/11/2016. For the sake of clarity, we extract below the RBI Circular No. DCM(Plg) No. 1273/10, 27.00/2016-17, dated 14/1/2016.
“RBI/2016-17/130 DCM (Plg) No.1273/10.27.00/2016-17 November 14, 2016 The Chairman / Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Public Sector Banks / Private Sector Banks/ Foreign Banks/Regional RuralBanks / Urban Co-operative Banks / State Co-operative Banks/ District Central Cooperative Banks Dear Sir, Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of existing ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- Bank Notes – Applicability of the Scheme to DCCBs Please refer to our Circular No. DCM (Plg) No.1226/10.27.00/2016-17 dated November 08, 2016 on the captioned subject. It is clarified that District Central Cooperative Banks can allow their existing customers to withdraw money from their accounts upto ₹ 24,000/- per week upto November 24, 2016. However no exchange facility against the specified bank notes (₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/-) or deposit of such notes should be entertained by them.
All banks are advised to permit withdrawal of cash by DCCBs from their accounts based on need. The cash withdrawal limit of ₹ 24,000/- per week is not applicable to withdrawal of cash by a DCCB from its account with any other bank. Yours faithfully, (P Vijaya Kumar) Chief General Manager”
As per the submissions of the Ld. AR, the Ld. AO has allowed the deposit of SBNs in the case of Gandhi Cooperative Urban Bank Limited by passing the order dated 19/12/2019. However, in the instant case, the Ld.AO has contradicted himself by considering the assessee as District Central Cooperative Bank (DCCB) and has not allowed the deposit of SBNs for the period 14/12/2016 to 30/12/2016. However, we find that in the instant case, the assessee being an Urban Cooperative Bank, which is not being covered by the above referred RBI Circular and hence acceptance of the cash in the form of SBNs cannot be considered as unexplained for addition U/s. 68 of the Act. We are therefore inclined to allow the grounds raised by the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026