DURGA RAO SOLA,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 170/VIZ/2024Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam12 August 2024AY 2020-21Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, while acknowledging the assessee's non-compliance, decided to provide one final opportunity based on principles of natural justice. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits after the assessee submits evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return of income which was processed under section 143(1) with an addition for late payment of employee's EPF & ESI contributions. The assessee failed to comply with notices issued by the CIT(A), leading to the dismissal of their appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance was justified, and if a final opportunity should be granted to the assessee to present evidence.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
For Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.AR
Pronounced: 12.08.2024

सुिवाई समाप्त होिे की ततति/ Date of Conclusion of Hearing 23.07.2024 : घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date of Pronouncement : 12.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

PER SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ahmedabad [hereinafter in Durga Rao Sola short “Ld. CIT(A)”]in DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2023- 24/1061515048(1) dated 26.02.2024 arising out of intimation passed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) for the A.Y.2020-21.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that, assessee being an individual filed his return of income for the A.Y. 2020-21 admitting a total income Rs.1,03,62,230/-. The return was summarily processed under section 143(1) of the Act by the Centralized Processing Centre, Bangalore [hereinafter in short “CPC”] on 30.11.2021 determining total income at Rs. 1,14,38,471/-. The addition made in the intimation was due to adjustment towards the late payment of EPF & ESI pertaining to employees’ contribution as deciphered from the Tax Audit Report submitted under section 44AB of the Act.

3.

Before Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has not complied with various notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A). Ld. CIT(A) therefore dismissed the appeal of the assessee, considering that assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal and has not provided any documents and material evidences before the Ld. CIT(A).

Page No. 2

5.

At the outset, Ld. Authorized Representative [hereinafter in short “Ld.AR”] submitted that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is exparte and pleaded that one more final opportunity may be given to the assessee to substantiate and submit the documentary evidences with respect to disallowances.

6.

Per contra, Ld. Departmental Representative [hereinafter in short “Ld. DR”] relied on the order of the Ld. CIT(A).

7.

We have heard both the sides. Admittedly assessee has failed to respond to any of the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) considering the non-compliances by the assessee and by relying on various judicial pronouncements have dismissed the appeal of the assessee. However, following the principles of natural justice, we find it deem fit to provide one more opportunity to the assessee as pleaded by the Ld.AR to substantiate his claim and submit material evidences before Ld. CIT(A) and thereby remitting the matter back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A). We also direct the assessee to comply with the notices before the Ld. CIT(A) and provide material evidences in connection with Page No. 3

8.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 12th August, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (दुव्वूरु आरएल रेड्डी) (एस बालाकृष्णन) (S. BALAKRISHNAN) (DUVVURU RL REDDY) लेखा सदस्य /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated :.12.08.2024 Giridhar, Sr.PS आदेशकीप्रतिललपिअग्रेपिि/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. निर्धाररती/ The Assessee : Durga Rao Sola 54-20/2-7A, 8th Line Bharathi Nagar, Vijayawada – 520008 Andhra Pradesh 2. रधजस्व / The Revenue : Income Tax Officer – Circle – 1(1) C.R. Building, 1st Floor, Annex M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 Andhra Pradesh 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4. नवभधगीय प्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण, नवशधखधपटणम /DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax गधर्ा फ़धईल / Guard file 6.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →