M/S. UTKAL HIGHWAYS,CUTTACK vs. CIT, CUTTACK
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee was not pressing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-2011. The assessee's representative stated that they were not pressing the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be dismissed as not pressed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
Per N.S.Saini, AM
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order u/s.263 of
the Act of the ld CIT Cuttack, dated 31.3.2015, for the assessment year
2010-2011.
At the very outset, ld A.R. of the assessee submitted that he is not
pressing the appeal filed by the assessee, to which, ld D.R. had no
objection.
2 ITA No. 271 /CT K/ 2015 Asse ssment Year:20 10- 201 1
In view of above, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as not
pressed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 11 /07/2017 in the presence of parties. Sd/- sd/ (Pavan Kumar Gadale) (N.S Saini) JUDICIALMEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cuttack; Dated /07/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The appellant: M/s. Utkal Highways, Shreevihar Colony, Tulsipur, Cuttack 2. The Respondent. CIT, Cuttack 3. The CIT(A)-Cuttack 4. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 5. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER,
SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026