RASANDIK ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT (LTU), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that if no exempt income is earned, no disallowance under Section 14A can be made. Following the jurisdictional High Court's decisions, the disallowance was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the disallowance of ₹14,38,422 under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee had not earned any dividend income during the relevant assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is permissible when the assessee has not earned any exempt income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWALG.D. AGRAWAL & AND SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARGSHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP :- PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP PER G.D. AGRAWAL, VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-LTU, New Delhi dated 28th November, 2013.
The grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are against the disallowance of `14,38,422/- under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D.
We have heard the arguments of both the sides and perused the assessment order. From the assessment order, it is clear that no dividend income was earned by the assessee during the previous year. We find this issue to be covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Cheminvest
2 ITA-375/Del/2014 Limited Vs. CIT-VI in order dated 2nd September, 2015 and CIT-IV Vs. Holcim India P.Ltd. in ITA No.486/2014 & 299/2014, order dated 5th September, 2014, wherein Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court has held that if there is no exempt income, then no disallowance u/s 14A of the Act can be made. Admittedly, in the case of the assessee, there is no exempt income. Therefore, respectfully following the above decisions of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, we delete the disallowance of `14,38,422/- made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by learned CIT(A) u/s 14A of the Act. Ground Nos.1 & 2 are accordingly allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Decision pronounced in the open Court on 27.05.2016.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ramshrayashil Constructions PVT.LTD vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of INDIAJharkhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Kiea Corporate Business Solutions vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Vrajman Enterprises vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- Nimmakayala Padmavathi vs. The Union Of INDIAAndhra Pradesh · 2 Nov 2026
- Som Nath Nagar Mal Th Partner Sanjay Mahajan vs. Union Of INDIA Th Department Of Financial Services, Ministry Of Finance And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 2 Nov 2026