ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NIRVAN CLOTHING COMPANY LIMITED, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, citing a CBDT circular that revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to the ITAT to Rs. 10 lakh. This circular was made applicable retrospectively.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made on account of product development expenses and disallowance of setting off brought forward losses with FDR interest income. The tax effect involved was less than Rs. 10 lakh.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeal should be dismissed based on the revised monetary limits stipulated by the CBDT circular for filing appeals before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI
Before: SMT DIVA SINGH & SH.L.P.SAHU
Date of Hearing 02.05.2016 Date of Pronouncement 05.05.2016 ORDER
PER DIVA SINGH, JM
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue assailing the correctness of the order dated 25.03.2014 of CIT(A)-XVI, Delhi pertaining to 2006-07 assessment year on the following grounds:
– 1. “On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.1,27,856/- made by the AO on account of ‘product development expenses’ by treating the same as revenue in nature ignoring the fact that the expenses are of enduring nature and assessee would take benefit of these expenses in subsequent years. 2. “On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.4,98,439/- made by the AO on account of disallowance of setting off b/f losses with interest income on FDR ignoring the fact that interest on FDR comes under the head “income from other sources”.
3. The appellant craves to be allowed to add any fresh grounds of appeal and/or delete or amend any of the grounds of appeal.”
2. Considering the amount at stake for the Revenue, both the parties were required to address Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT. Considering the same in the facts on record, the Ld. Sr. DR fairly conceded that I.T.A .No.-3641/Del/2014 the departmental appeal has been filed wherein the tax effect involved is much less than Rs.10 lakh.
We have heard the submissions of the parties on this issue and perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide the aforesaid Circular dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limit to Rs.10 lakh for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Vide para 10 of the aforesaid Circular Para 3 has been made applicable retrospectively. Considering the settled legal precedent that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are binding on the authorities, we dismiss the departmental appeal considering the material available on record.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 05 May, 2016.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026