DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. TOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal. This was based on a CBDT circular that revised the monetary limit for filing appeals to the ITAT to Rs. 10 lakh, and this limit was made applicable retrospectively.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order that deleted an addition made by the AO. The tax effect involved in the appeal was less than Rs. 10 lakh.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeal should be dismissed due to the tax effect being below the revised monetary limit stipulated by a CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘I-2’ NEW DELHI
Before: SMT DIVA SINGH & SHRI L. P. SAHU
Date of Hearing 06.04.2016 Date of Pronouncement 13.05.2016 ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, JM The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue assailing the correctness of the order dated 21.01.2014 passed by DCIT, New Delhi pertaining to Assessment Year 2009-10 on the following grounds:-
1. “On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld.DRP, Panel-II, New Delhi erred in deleting the addition of Rs.19,74,842/- (18,96,76,184/--18,77,01,342) made by the AO u/s 92CA of the Act.
2. The appellant craves for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of appeal.”
2. Considering the amount at stake for the Revenue, both the parties were required to address Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT. On consideration of the facts on record and the aforesaid Circular of the CBDT, the Ld. Sr. DR fairly conceded that the departmental appeal has been filed wherein the tax effect involved is much less than Rs.10 lakh.
3. We have heard the submissions of the parties on this issue and perused the material on record. We find that the CBDT vide the aforesaid Circular I.T.A .No.-870/Del/2014 dated 10.12.2015 has revised the monetary limit to Rs.10 lakh for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Vide para 10 of the aforesaid Circular Para 3 has been made applicable retrospectively. Considering the settled legal precedent that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are binding on the authorities, we dismiss the departmental appeal considering the material available on record.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 13 of May 2016.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026