OM ENCLAVE(P)LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO,WARD-8(2), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1038/KOL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 January 2024AY 2012-13Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Girish Agrawal (Accountant Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. This was done to ensure tax is assessed on the right person, right income, and in the right assessment year, considering the new development.

What were the facts?

A search was conducted on the assessee company's director, who admitted the company was a shell entity used for providing accommodation entries. This admission occurred after the initial assessment was framed.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment needs to be re-framed based on a subsequent admission by the director regarding the company's nature as a shell entity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘A’, KOLKATA

Before: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal]

Hearing: 24.01.2024Pronounced: 25.01.2024

ORDER

Per Sonjoy Sarma, JM:

1.

This appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 is directed against the order dated 09.08.2023 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeals, NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the ‘ld. CIT(A)’].

2.

At the outset the ld. AR brought to our knowledge that a new development has taken place in the case of assessee. As per the ld. AR, after the assessment was framed against the assessee, a search was carried out on 03.01.2018 wherein the statement of director of this assessee company was also recorded u/s 132(4) of the Act wherein for question no. 9 the director has accepted that the assessee company which is seen at serial no. 12 of the table given under answer to question no. 9 that it was controlled and managed by him and that the assessee company is a paper / shell company formed with the sole purpose of providing accommodation entries in the form of bogus share premium / bogus unsecured loans to different beneficiaries. In the light of the aforesaid development, in the interest of justice and fair play, the assessment made, need to OM Enclave (P) Ltd. be framed afresh. On the other hand, ld. DR has no objection to such prayer made by ld. AR of the assessee. In the light of the aforesaid new development, and keeping in mind, the settled position of law that the tax has to be assessed on the right person, right income and in the right assessment year, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication in the light of the new development after the search which happened on 03.01.2018.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 132(4)

All 3,819 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132(4) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →