ANJALI CINETORIUM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT 8, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee stated that they were no longer aggrieved by the CIT's order as no additions were made. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed by the CIT under section 263. During the set aside proceedings, the Assessing Officer made no additions to the income.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is still aggrieved by the CIT's revision order when no additions were made in the subsequent assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI SANJAY GARG
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee agitating the revision order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax [hereinafter referred to as the CIT] relevant to assessment year 2008-09 invoking jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
At the outset, the Ld. A.R. of the assessee has made a statement that in the set aside proceedings, the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the AO) has not made any additions and the assessee is no more aggrieved by the order of the CIT passed under section 263 of the Act. She has, thus, prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
The Ld. D.R. has not objected to the same.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18.08.2016.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026