Anjali Cinetorium P.Ltd, Mumbai vs CIT | ITAT Mumbai 2016

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI SANJAY GARG

For Appellant: Ms. Mrugakshi Joshi, A.R

For Respondent: Ms. Sushmita Mishra, D.R

Hearing: 18.08.2016Pronounced: 18.08.2016

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee agitating the revision order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax [hereinafter referred to as the CIT] relevant to assessment year 2008-09 invoking jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.

At the outset, the Ld. A.R. of the assessee has made a statement that in the set aside proceedings, the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the AO) has not made any additions and the assessee is no more aggrieved by the order of the CIT passed under section 263 of the Act. She has, thus, prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.

The Ld. D.R. has not objected to the same.

Order pronounced in the open court on 18.08.2016.

ANJALI CINETORIUM P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. CIT 8, MUMBAI