ANOOP DEWANI,NEW DELHI vs. ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ACIT/ITO, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4752/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 November 2025AY 2018-193 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 90 days in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) in the interest of justice. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after hearing the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of 90 days and without a plausible explanation. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to this delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the appeal decided on merits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI

For Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Hearing: 03.11.2025

(Assessment Year: 2018-19) Anoop Dewani, vs. Addl./Joint/Depty/ACIT, 92, Anupam Apartments, NFAC, Delhi. M.B. Road, Saket, New Delhi – 110 068. (PAN : ADUPD8083H) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 03.11.2025 Date of Order : 03.11.2025 O R D E R

PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

1.

The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 12.03.2025 for the AY 2018-19.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. We proceeded to adjudicate the issue with the assistance of ld. DR of the Revenue.

3.

At the time of hearing, it is observed from the order of ld. CIT (A) that the appeal was filed before the ld. CIT (A) on 14.08.2021 with a delay of 90 days and that too without any plausible explanation. Accordingly, ld. CIT (A) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable on the ground that the current appeal fails on account of non-condonation of inordinate delay.

4.

On the other hand, ld. DR for the Revenue relied on the orders of the authorities below.

5.

Considered the submissions of the ld. DR of the Revenue and material placed on record. We observe that there is a meagre delay of 90 days in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT (A) and the ld. CIT (A) dismissed the appeal being not maintainable. However, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT (A). Accordingly, we restore the matter to the file of ld. CIT (A) to decide afresh as per law, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. We also direct assessee to make proper submissions and appear before the ld.CIT (A) on the date of hearing and cooperate with the tax authorities. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →