BILARI COOPERATIVE CANE UNION, BILARI,BILARI, MORADABAD vs. INCOME TAX WARD 2(1), MORADABAD, MORADABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest income derived from surplus funds in fixed deposits with scheduled/nationalized banks is derived from an eligible business activity under section 80P(2). Consequently, it should not be assessed as income from 'other sources'.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2020-21 arose from proceedings under section 143(3). The lower authorities refused section 80P deduction on interest income from surplus deposits kept in scheduled/nationalized banks.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by the assessee on surplus funds deposited with scheduled/nationalized banks is deductible under section 80P.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v. CIT299 citing396 ITR 371 · 2017 · HC
- Bhagyalaxmi Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. DCIT8 citing170 Taxmann.com 336 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
Date of hearing 03.11.2025 Date of pronouncement 03.11.2025 ORDER
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059015667(1), dated 22.12.2023 involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have refused section 80P deduction to the assessee qua her interest income derived from surplus deposits kept in scheduled/nationalized banks amounting to Rs.76,92,252/-; in assessment order dated 21.09.2022 and upheld in the lower appellate discussion.
Both the learned lower authorities hold that such interest income as in the present instance derived from bargaining of surplus funds in fixed deposits with scheduled/nationalized banks could not be held as “derived” from an eligible business activity under section 80P(2); and, therefore, the same deserves to be assessed as income from “other sources” only.
Mr. Gupta also quotes (2025) 170 taxmann.com 336 (Gujarat) Brahmarshi Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ACIT deciding the very issue in the Revenue’s favour. The assessee on the other hand draws strong support from the Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v. CIT [(2017) 396 ITR 371] (AP) wherein their lordships have rejected the Revenue’s identical stand. Be that as it may, the fact remains that no valuable guidance has come from hon’ble jurisdictional high court at Allahabad on the instant issue. That 2 | P a g e being the case, we hereby quote Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal-I v. Vegetable Products Ltd. [1973] 88 ITR 192 (SC) to conclude that the view supporting the assessee’s case in such an instance has to be adopted; to accept the instant sole substantive ground against the department in very terms. Necessary computation shall follow as per law. No other ground or argument has been pressed before us.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026