KALYAN,PURULIA vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the CIT (Exemptions) to reconsider the assessee's application for permanent registration under Section 12AB. This reconsideration should be done in accordance with the law, after providing the assessee with an opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for permanent registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application, deeming it premature because a previous order under Form 10AC was still valid until 2026-2027.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for permanent registration under Section 12AB is premature when a valid registration under Form 10AC already exists. The need for the CIT (Exemptions) to provide an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘C’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Girish Agrawal]
ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, JM:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.07.2023 passed by CIT (Exemptions).
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed an application u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act in Form 10AB before ld. CIT(E), Kolkata. However, application of the assessee filed before CIT(E) was rejected by citing that the application filed by the assessee was premature and non-maintainable as earlier order has been passed in Form 10AC is still valid till 2026-2027.
Aggrieved by the above order, assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal stating that the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT(E) erred in law and fact by which not granting any benefit in respect of permanent registration as claimed u/s 12AB of the Act by assessee before him merely by quoting that application of the assessee was premature as earlier order Form 10AC is still valid till A.Y. 2026-2027. The ld. AR therefore, prayed before the bench as the assessee complied necessary rule 17A of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 for application along with requisition documents and 2 Kalyan also complied the necessary requisite as stated in section 12AB(1)(b)(i) prescribed time to time for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. However, the claim of the assessee was turned down by CIT(E). Therefore, the ld. AR prayed before the bench stating that direction may be given to the CIT(E) for grant of permanent registration to the assessee u/s 12AB of the Act as against the decision passed by ld. CIT(E) against the assessee.
On the other hand, ld. DR supported the decision passed by the ld. CIT(E).
We after hearing the rival submission of the parties and perused the material available on record and find it necessary to direct the ld. CIT(E) to reconsider the application of assessee for permanent registration filed u/s 12AB of the Act in accordance with law after giving necessary opportunity of being heard to the assessee. In terms of above, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026