No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI N.K. PRADHAN
Instant appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21st September 2015, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)–1, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2011–12.
The issue raised in the present appeal is in relation to the disallowance of exemption claimed of an amount of ` 95 lakh under section 11(2) of the Act.
2 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal
Brief facts are the assessee a trust is registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"). For the assessment year under consideration, the assessee filed its return of income on 9th August 2011, declaring total income of ` 78,210. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer on verifying the financial statement of the assessee, along with the return of income noticed that the assessee has claimed accumulation of fund at ` 95 under section 11(2) of the Act. The Assessing Officer, therefore, issued a show cause notice to the assessee to explain why exemption claimed under section 11 of the Act on the accumulated fund amounting to ` 95 lakh set apart for utilisation in future should not be disallowed. In response to the show cause notice, the assessee while objecting to the proposed disallowance submitted that not only the assessee maintains books of account as per statutory requirement but its accounts are audited. It was submitted, along with the return of income assessee has not only filed the audit report in the specified manner but also filed Form no.10 along with the copy of resolution mentioning the purpose for which the accumulated fund was set apart. The assessee submitted, accumulated fund was set apart for carrying out the object of the trust which is for utilisation in the up–coming projects. The Assessing Officer, after considering the submissions of the assessee, however, observed that the purpose of accumulation shown by the 3 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal assessee is general in nature and it does not specified the specific object or purpose for which accumulated fund is to be utilised. He observed, assessee was not able to substantiate the purpose of accumulation with any concrete plan of action supported with documentary evidence. Accordingly, he disallowed the claim of accumulated funds under section 11(2) and brought to tax the amount of ` 95 lakh. Being aggrieved of such addition, assessee preferred appeal before the learned Commissioner (Appeals).
Before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), though, the assessee made elaborate submissions contesting the finding of the Assessing Officer and justifying its claim, however, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) endorsing the view of the Assessing Officer held that as the assessee has not specified in Form no.10, any concrete project or purpose for which the accumulated fund was set apart no exemption can be allowed to the assessee.
Learned Authorised Representative submitted, one of the main object of the trust is to construct Mahajan Wadi, Hostels, Shelters, etc., for the members and needy students of Daiwadnya Samaj. He submitted, the surplus funds available with the trust which could not be applied for the objects during the relevant previous year was accumulated and set apart for the purpose of achieving the object of 4 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal the trust. He submitted, in Form no.10, submitted along with return of income and the accompanying resolution of the trust, the purpose for which the accumulated fund was set apart was clearly and specifically mentioned. In this context, he drew our attention to Form no.10 dated 27th June 2011 and resolution of the trust dated 27th June 2011. Further elaborating, learned Authorised Representative submitted, the trust has constructed a building to be utilised as hostel for outstation students. The building being a very old one is in a dilapidated condition. Therefore, a project was undertaken for re–development of the hostel building as well as other existing properties of the trust. Thus, the learned Authorised Representative submitted, the allegation of the Departmental Authorities that the purpose of accumulation of fund is general in nature is not correct. Learned Authorised Representative submitted, the purpose of accumulation set out in form no.10 if read along with the resolution of the trust as well as the objects of the trust would clearly indicate that the accumulation of fund was for the purpose of achieving the object of the trust. Learned Authorised Representative submitted, as per section 11(3) the assessee is required to utilise the accumulated funds for the purpose for which it is set apart within a period of five years. Therefore, until the expiry of five years, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow the assessee’s claim of exemption as per statutory provisions contained
5 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal under section 11(3). The Assessing Officer can only look into the aspect of utilisation of the accumulated funds for the specified purpose after the expiry of five years and if he finds that it was not utilised for the specified purpose then only he can disallow assessee’s claim. Thus, he submitted, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow assessee’s claim in the first year itself. In support of his contention, learned Authorised Representative relied upon the following decisions:– i) Shri Ram Nagar Trust no.1 v/s DDIT, ITA no.2150/Mum./2015 dated 31.5.2016; ii) DIT (E) v/s Envisions, [2015] 58 taxmann.com 184 (Kar.); iii) DIT(E) v/s NBIE Welfare Society, [2015], 370 ITR 490 (Del.); iv) CIT v/s National Institute and Financial Management, [2010] 322 ITR 694 (P&H); v) DIT v/s Mitsui & Co., Environmental, [2008] 167 taxmann.com 43 (Del.); and vi) Bharat Kalyan Pratishthan v/s DIT(E), [2007] 299 ITR 406 (Del.).
Learned Departmental Representative relying upon the observations of the Assessing Officer and the learned Commissioner (Appeals) submitted, as the assessee has not specifically mentioned the purpose of accumulation with any concrete plan and documentary evidence assessee’s claim was rightly disallowed.
We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the material available on record. Undisputedly, the assessee is 6 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal registered as charitable trust under section 12A. Therefore, the assessee is eligible to claim exemption under section 11 subject to fulfillment of conditions enshrined therein. This factual position has not been disputed by the Department. On a perusal of section 11 of the Act, it is noticed, income derived by a charitable trust or institution shall not be included in the total income of the previous year to the extent to which the income so accumulated or set apart is not in excess of 15% of the income from such property. Sub–section (2) of section 11 provides that where 85% of the income referred to under sub–section (1) of section 11, is not applied to charitable or religious purpose during the previous year but is accumulated or set apart either in whole or in part for application to such purpose in India, the income so accumulated or set apart shall not be included in the total income of the previous year in which such income was received subject to fulfillment of condition mentioned in clause (a) & (b) which provides that the trust submits in writing before the Assessing Officer the purpose for which the income is accumulated or set apart and the period for which the income is to be accumulated shall not exceed five years. The second condition is the fund accumulated or set apart has to be invested or deposited in any of the mode specified in sub–section (5) of section 11. Keeping in view the aforesaid statutory provisions if we examine the facts of the present case, it is to be noticed that the 7 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal assessee has accumulated funds of ` 95 lakh which has been set apart for utilisation in the objects of the trust in subsequent years. In compliance to the provisions of section 11(2)(a), assessee along with return of income has filed a declaration in form no.10. On a perusal of the said declaration dated 27th June 2011, a copy of which is at Page– 27 of the paper book it is noticed that the purpose for which the fund has been accumulated or set apart is to spend on development of existing properties of the trust or purchase or construction of new building for carrying out the activities of the trust. Along with declaration in form n o.10, the assessee has also enclosed a resolution of the managing committee of the trust dated 27th June 2011, which reads as under:–
"RESOLVED that out of the income of the trust for the previous year 31/03/2011, relevant to the assessment year 2011-12 an amount of Rs.95,00,000/- being 56 per cent of the income of the trust, as is available at the end of the previous year ended 31/0312011 be accumulated or set apart and transferred to "Building and Amenities Reserve 2011 ", till the previous year(s) ending 31/03/2016 in order to enable the trust, to accumulate sufficient funds for the purpose of spending on development of existing properties of the trust or purchase or construction of new buildings for carrying out the activities of the Trust".
Further, on reading of the trust deed, we have noted that the main object of the trust is to construct Mahajan Wadi at Bombay and to purchase and construct such other land and structures to enable to help gathering of Sammelans of member of Daiwadnya Samaj, to built
8 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal Vasati Graha and hostel for the poor and needy student of the samaj, to build and renovate vachanalaya / library, providing shelter to make temporary provisions of residence for those who come to Mumbai from their villages. Thus, the purpose for which the accumulated fund is set apart as mentioned in Form no.10 as well as resolution of the trust if read in conjunction with the objects set out in the trust deed clearly demonstrate that the purpose of utilisation of accumulated fund is for achieving the objects of the trust. It has been submitted before us by the learned Authorised Representative that the building used as hostel for outstation student is in a dilapidated condition, therefore, a project is under way to re–construct / re–develop the building. In this context, certain inspection reports of Engineers, work orders and copy of resolutions were placed before the Bench. Be that as it may, on a perusal of Form no.10, along with copy of resolution submitted before the Assessing Officer in terms of section 11(2)(a), we have found that the assessee has clearly mentioned that the accumulated fund has been set apart for utilisation in development of existing properties of the trust or purchase or construction of new building for carrying out the activities of the trust. The aforesaid purpose set out in Form no.10 is clearly in consonance with the object of the trust. That being the factual position, the allegation of the Department that the purpose of accumulation of fund is general in nature is without any basis, hence,
9 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal cannot be accepted. In case of DIT(E) v/s Envisions (supra), the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court after considering disallowance of exemption on similar nature of allegation by the Department held that since the purpose for which the fund was accumulated or set apart was for achieving the objects of the trust, no disallowance can be made. We have noted that in case of NBIE Welfare Society (supra), the Assessing Officer disallowed assessee’s claim of exemption under section 11(2) as in Form no.10, the assessee had mentioned the purpose of accumulation as “further utilisation”. The Hon'ble High Court after considering the issue vis–a–vis the objects of the trust held that the description “further utilisation” cannot be considered to be either vague or unspecified. Therefore, the Hon'ble High Court upheld assessee’s claim of exemption under section 11(2). If we consider the facts of the present case in the light of the aforesaid judicial precedents it emerges that assessee’s case stands in a better footing. As we have already noted, in Form no.10, as well as resolution of the trust, the assessee has specifically mentioned the purpose of utilization of fund in construction / re–development of buildings / properties of the trust. Thus, the purpose of utilization is in consonance with the objects of the trust. That being the case, assessee’s claim cannot be disallowed. We also find merit in the submission of the assessee that disallowances envisaged on account of non–utilisation of accumulated
10 Daivadnya Samjonnati Parishad Mahajanwadi Mandal fund cannot be made in the first year of claim. A reading of provisions contained in section 11(3) along with section 11(2) of the Act, makes it clear that only after the expiry of five years period if the Assessing Officer finds that the accumulated or set apart funds were not utilised for achieving the objects of the trust then only he can disallow assessee’s claim of exemption under section 11(2). For the aforesaid reasons, we do not agree with the conclusion of the Departmental Authorities. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) and allow assessee’s claim of exemption under section 11(2).
In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 16.09.2016