Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVISION” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
आदेश /O R D E R
PER SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter in short “Ld. CIT(A)”] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1056687729(1) dated 30/09/2023 arising out of order passed Under section 144 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 30/11/2019 for the A.Y. 2017-18.
I.T.A.No.127/VIZ/2024 Pulla Satyaveni 2. At the outset, the Learned Authorized Representative (“Ld. AR”) drawn our attention to the petition filed by the assessee, dated 27/11/2024, seeking permission of the Bench to withdraw the appeal and mentioned that mistakenly the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) instead of consequential order passed by the Ld. AO U/s. 250 r.w.s 154 of the Act, dated 22/01/2024. Therefore, the Ld. AR pleaded that the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
The Learned Departmental Representative (“Ld. DR”) did not object to the submission of the Ld. AR.
After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the assessee’s application dated 27/11/2024 wherein the assessee pleaded for withdrawal of the appeal stating the reason that the assessee filed the appeal against the order of the Ld.CIT(A) instead of consequential order passed by the Ld. AO U/s. 250 r.w.s 154 of the Act, dated 22/01/2024, we hereby allow the assessee to withdraw his appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th November, 2024.