BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

PDF
ITA 1299/KOL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata29 February 2024AY 2012-13Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg (Judicial Member), Shri Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member)2 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumar

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.1299/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Britannia Industries Ltd…………...........................…………………….……Appellant 5/1A, Hungerford Street, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata- 700017. [PAN: AABCB2066P] vs. DCIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata………..…..…….…..….........…........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri S. Datta, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : February 27, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : February 29, 2024 ORDER Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 02.11.2023 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsel has invited our attention to the impugned order of the CIT(A) to submit that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee under the misconception that the assessee has availed Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. The ld. Counsel has further submitted that even the assessee duly apprised by writing a letter to the ld. CIT(A) that the assessee has not availed any such Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. However, the ld. CIT(A) without considering the said submissions, dismissed the appeal of the assessee under the misconception that the tax liabilities of the assessee have already been settled. The ld. Counsel, therefore, has requested that the appeal of the assessee may be restored to the CIT(A) for decision on merits.

I.T.A. No.1299/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Britannia Industries Ltd

3.

In view of the above submissions of the ld. Counsel for the assessee, the impugned order of the CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(A) for decision afresh in accordance with law. Needless to say that the CIT(A) will given proper opportunity to the assessee to present its case.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Kolkata, the 29th February, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member

Dated: 29.02.2024. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Britannia Industries Ltd 2. DCIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR),

//True copy// By order Assistant Registrar, Kolkata Benches

BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. ,KOLKATA vs DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA | BharatTax