KARUNAKAR MOHANTY,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, BHUBANESWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 22/CTK/2013Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 June 2017AY 2008-092 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the assessee's conduct indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The case was listed for hearing multiple times, but the assessee or their representative failed to appear or provide instructions.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's failure to prosecute their appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK

Before: SHRI N.S SAINI

For Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Pronounced: 28/06

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-

1, Bhubaneswar , dated 1.11.2012 for the assessment year 2008-09.

2.

The appeal in this case was first fixed for hearing on 8.10.2013. None

appeared on behalf of the assessee, hence, the case was adjourned.

Thereafter, the case was fixed for hearing on 28.4.2014, 28.10.2015,

8.12.2015, 7.1.2016, 18.10.2016, 25.10.2016, 22.11.2016, 22.12.2016,

18.1.2017, 7.3.2017, 15.3.2017, 29.3.2017, 17.5.2017, 13.6.2016 and

28.6.2017. Today i.e. on 28.6.2017, when the case was called for hearing,

ld A.R. of the assessee has submitted that he has no instruction to appear

in this case. The above conduct of the assessee shows that he is not

2 ITA No. 22/ CTK/2013 Asse ssment Year :20 08- 09

interested in pursuing the present appeal before the Tribunal. Therefore, I

dismiss the appeal of the assessee for want of prosecution.

3.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28 /06/2017 in the presence of parties. Sd/- (N.S Saini) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 28/06/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The appellant : Karunakar Mohanty, 607, Lewis Road, Bhubaneswar 2. The respondent : ITO, Ward 1(3), Bhubaneswar. 3. The CIT(A) -1, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT,-1, Bhubaneswar 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack BY ORDER, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →