MANISH KAMLESHBHAI SAKHIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. PCIT JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 225/RJT/2025Status: HeardITAT Rajkot04 February 2026AY 2021-22Bench: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI (Accountant Member), DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, as the revision order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 became infructuous due to the CIT(A) remitting the entire matter back to the AO.

What were the facts?

The assessee's original assessment order was passed under Section 144 r.w.s. 144B. The CIT(A) remitted the entire appeal back to the AO for fresh adjudication. Subsequently, the PCIT exercised jurisdiction under Section 263 on the same assessment order.

What were the issues?

Whether a revision order under Section 263 is valid when the underlying assessment order has been remitted back to the AO by the CIT(A).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 144B,Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT

Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA

Hearing: 03/02/2026Pronounced: 04/02/2026

आदेश /ORDER PER DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamnagar (in short, Ld. PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) vide order dated 12.02.2025.

2.

At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that in the assessee’s case, the original order was passed by the AO on 28.12.20222 under section 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act. Against this order, the assessee filed the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who in turn remitted the issue back to the file of AO for fresh adjudication. The Ld. PCIT exercised his jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act on the same assessment order passed under section 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act dated 28.12.2022. Since the Ld. CIT(A) has remitted the entire appeal of the assessee back to the file of 2021-22 Manish Kamleshbhai Sakhiya AO, therefore, the revision order passed by the Ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Act vide order dated 28.12.2022 becomes infructuous, therefore, the assessee wants to withdraw this appeal.

3.

On the other hand, the Learned Departmental Representative (Ld. DR) for the revenue did not have any objection if the assessee withdrawn this appeal.

4.

We have heard both the parties and carefully gone through the submissions put forth on behalf of the assessee along with the documents furnished and the case laws relied upon and perused the facts of the case including the findings of the Ld. PCIT and other material brought on record. We accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of this appeal, therefore, consequently, we treat this appeal as dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

More judgments on Section 144B

All 10,521 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →