MANISH KAMLESHBHAI SAKHIYA,JAMNAGAR vs. PCIT JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, as the revision order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 became infructuous due to the CIT(A) remitting the entire matter back to the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee's original assessment order was passed under Section 144 r.w.s. 144B. The CIT(A) remitted the entire appeal back to the AO for fresh adjudication. Subsequently, the PCIT exercised jurisdiction under Section 263 on the same assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether a revision order under Section 263 is valid when the underlying assessment order has been remitted back to the AO by the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & DR. DINESH MOHAN SINHA
आदेश /ORDER PER DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamnagar (in short, Ld. PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) vide order dated 12.02.2025.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that in the assessee’s case, the original order was passed by the AO on 28.12.20222 under section 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act. Against this order, the assessee filed the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who in turn remitted the issue back to the file of AO for fresh adjudication. The Ld. PCIT exercised his jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act on the same assessment order passed under section 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act dated 28.12.2022. Since the Ld. CIT(A) has remitted the entire appeal of the assessee back to the file of 2021-22 Manish Kamleshbhai Sakhiya AO, therefore, the revision order passed by the Ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Act vide order dated 28.12.2022 becomes infructuous, therefore, the assessee wants to withdraw this appeal.
On the other hand, the Learned Departmental Representative (Ld. DR) for the revenue did not have any objection if the assessee withdrawn this appeal.
We have heard both the parties and carefully gone through the submissions put forth on behalf of the assessee along with the documents furnished and the case laws relied upon and perused the facts of the case including the findings of the Ld. PCIT and other material brought on record. We accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of this appeal, therefore, consequently, we treat this appeal as dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026