INTEGRATED COAL MINING LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ADIT, CPC , BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) misconstrued the provisions of Section 80M. The Tribunal found that the provisions inserted by the Finance Act, 2020, were indeed effective from AY 2021-22 and set aside the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80M for inter-corporate dividends. The AO and CIT(A) denied this deduction, stating the provision was not applicable for AY 2021-22. The CIT(A) incorrectly believed the provision was effective from AY 2022-23.
What were the issues?
The key issue was the applicability of Section 80M for AY 2021-22 concerning inter-corporate dividend deductions, and whether the CIT(A) correctly interpreted the Finance Act, 2020 amendments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg&Shri Rajesh Kumar]
This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. PCIT’] dated 01.11. 2023 for the assessment year 2021-22.
At the time of hearing, ground nos. 1 , 2 and 5 are not pressed and therefore the same are dismissed as not pressed.
Integrated Coal Mining Limited 3. Issue raised in ground nos. 3 & 4 is against the order of Ld. CIT(A) upholding the order of AO,CPC wherein the deduction claimed u/s 80M of the Act by the assessee of Rs. 4,83,91,380/- was denied by ignoring the fact that Finance Act, 2020 provides that deduction u/s 80M of the Act will be applicable in respect of certain inter corporate dividends which was effective from01.4.2021 and is accordingly applicable to AY 2021-22 and subsequent years. The instant assessment year before us is A.Y.2021-22 and is covered by the provisions of section 80M of the Act. The assessee during the year claimed deduction on account of inter corporate dividends amounting to Rs. 4,83,91,380/- u/s 80M of the Act. However it was not allowed by the AO/CPC in intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 30.03.2022.
In the appellate proceedings, the Ld. CIT(A) also dismissed the appeal of the assessee upon wrong understanding of provisions of Finance Act, 2020 qua Section 80M. The relevant finding of Ld. CIT(A) is extracted below:
5.3. In this regard, it is stated that Section 80M of the Act provides for deduction of inter corporate dividends received a domestic company from its subsidiaries. The Section was introduced in the Finance Act, 2020 w.e.f 01.04.2021 and is applicable from 2022-23 onwards. Prior to its insertion, section 80M as inserted by Finance Act, 2002 and later on omitted by Finance Act, 2003. 5.4. The appellant is in appeal for AY 2021-22. As such, deduction u/s 80M did not exist for the year AY 2021-22. Besides, one of the conditions to claim deduction u/s 80M is that the dividend must be received by the domestic company on or after 01.04.2021. This is not the case of the appellant as he has received the dividend at least before 30.09.2020 (the day be distributed it to its shareholders). 5.5. In light of the above, the contention of the appellant that he should be allowed deduction in AY 2021-22, u/s 80M is misconceived. 5.6. Therefore, Ground nos. 6 to 8 are dismissed.
From perusal of the findings of Ld. CIT(A) as extracted above, we find that Ld. CIT(A) has clearly misconstrued the provisions of Section 80M of the Act as inserted by Finance Act, 2020 which are effective from AY 2021-22. We note that the Ld. CIT(A) has recorded a finding that these provisions are applicable from A.Y. 2022-23 which is not correct and wrong findings on the part of the appellate authority and Integrated Coal Mining Limited cannot be sustained. Accordingly we set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and direct the AO to allow the deduction u/s 80M of the Act to the assessee as claimed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 19th March, 2024
More judgments on Section 80M
- Karnataka Co-Operative Oil Seeds Growers… vs ACIT, Circle 1(1)(1), Bangalore, Bmtc…ITA 1969/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Steel Authority of India Ltd., Delhi vs ACIT, Circle-22(2), New DelhiITA 4201/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed15 May 2026AY 2021-22
- Asian Paints Limited, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 3489/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2021-22
- Commissioner of Income Tax -II, Chandigarh vs M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumers, PatialaITA/645/200827 Jan 2026
- M/S. Rallis India Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT, 8(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7255/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Jan 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026