SAVADIKA RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON, HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURGAON, HARYANA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2753/DEL/2025Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 November 2025AY 2022-23Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH (Accountant Member)5 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer erred in allowing TDS credit on a proportionate basis, as the Assessee had offered the entire income to tax. The discrepancy was explained by sales returns, and the total declared turnover tallied with Form 26AS.

What were the facts?

The Assessee's appeals concerned the Ld. CIT(A)'s confirmation of the CPC's order restricting TDS credit due to turnover discrepancies between the return and Form 26AS. The Assessee claimed TDS correctly as per Form 26AS.

What were the issues?

Whether TDS credit restricted due to turnover discrepancies between return income and Form 26AS should be allowed in full when the Assessee has offered the entire income to tax and explained the discrepancy with sales returns.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 194 O,Section 37BA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI

Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH

For Appellant: Adv and Sh. Vibhor
Hearing: 03/11/2025Pronounced: 07/11/2025

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A. No. 2753/DEL/2025
I.T.A. No. 2754/DEL/2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

per Form No. 26AS filed by the Assessee in both the Assessment Years under consideration.

5.

In the result, both the Appeals of the Assessee are allowed.

More judgments on Section 37BA

All 74 judgments and leading authorities on Section 37BA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →