Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against the order dt. 17/01/2024, of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), (hereinafter the “ld. CIT(E)”).
The sole grievance of the assessee is against the action of the ld. CIT(E) in rejecting the application of the assessee for final approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee, submitted that the assessee was granted provisional approval u/s 80G of the Act vide order dt. 17/09/2022 which was valid from 17/09/2022 till financial year 2025-26. Subsequently, application for final approval was filed on 31/07/2023 in Form 10AB. However, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application on the ground that the assessee commenced its activities during financial year 2019-20 itself which was evident from the income
2 Pawan Alka Rajgarhia Foundation and expenditure details filed for the year ended 31/03/2020, and the criteria laid down under explanation to clause (iii) of Section 80G(5) has not been fulfilled as per which the assessee had to apply for the final registration at least six months prior to the expiry of period of the provisional registration or within six months of commencement of its activities whichever is earlier. He submitted that the ld. CIT(E) took the basis of commencement of activities and rejected the application as non- maintainable, even though the assessee has followed the conditions. He placed reliance on the recent decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Diamond Cares vs. CIT in ITA No. 877/Kol/2023, order dt. 10/01/2023. The ld. D/R vehemently argued supporting the order of the ld. CIT(E).
We have heard rival contention and perused the material placed before us. We find that this issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Diamond Cares vs. CIT in ITA No. 877/Kol/2023 (supra), wherein the Tribunal under identical facts and circumstances has held under:- “6. As observed by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of West Bengal Welfare Society (supra) that though the assessee may have commenced its activities prior to applying for provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act, but that does not mean that once the assessee has commenced its activities or already has been doing charitable activities and it has not opted for getting benefits under the Income- tax Act, then such an assessee trust/charitable institution is barred in future from applying from registration/approval under the relevant provision of the Income-tax Act. In the present case, the assessee might have commenced its activities in the F.Y. 2020-21 as observed by the ld. CIT(E), however, the assessee for the first time, applied for grant of provisional registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act from Assessment Year 2023-24 onwards only. The ld. CIT(E) taking note of the past activity of the assessee has granted a provisional registration. The assessee did not carry out any activity after the grant of provisional registration on 26/05/2022. The assessee for the first time started its activity after grant of provisional registration on 15/09/2022, on which date the trust received donation. The assessee made donation and the assessee trust
3 Pawan Alka Rajgarhia Foundation thereafter applied for final registration on 30/12/2022 which was well within the period of six months from the commencement of its charitable activity after the date of provisional registration. If the view of the ld. CIT(E), under such circumstances, is considered to be correct then, any trust which is or has been already into charitable activities and has been granted provisional registration, the same will never be entitled for grant of final registration. Such an interpretation of the provisions of Section 80G(5) of the Act will defeat its purpose. Therefore, taking the reasonable construction of the said provision, the assessee is well within the prescribed limitation period to apply for the final approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act. The decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of West Bengal Welfare Society (supra) is fairly applicable in the present case. Therefore, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(E) is set aside and the ld. CIT(E) is directed to grant final approval to the assessee u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act, if the assessee is otherwise found eligible, irrespective of the date of application as discussed above.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.” {Emphasis ours}
As the facts involved in the present case are identical to those in the case of Diamond Cares vs. CIT(supra) and also taking note of the recent CBDT Circular dt. 25/04/2024 extending the due date of filing Form No. 10A/10AB upto 30/06/2024, we set aside the impugned order of the ld. CIT(E) with a direction to admit the application filed in Form 10AB on 31/07/2023 and grant final approval to the assessee u/s 80G(5)(iii) of the Act, if the assessee is found to be eligible, irrespective of the date of application.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Court on 3rd May, 2024 at Kolkata. (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Kolkata, Dated 03/05/2024 *SC SrPs Pawan Alka Rajgarhia Foundation
आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ" / The Assessee
""यथ" / The Respondent 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु" / Concerned Pr. CIT 4. आयकर आयु" अपील ( ) / The CIT(A)- 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध ,आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, कोलकाता/DR,ITAT, Kolkata, 6. गाड" फाई/ Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,