KETAN CHIMANLAL DHRUV,NA vs. ARIVS.ITO WARD-2, NAVSARI, NAVSARI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-MS SUCHITRA RAGHUNATH KAMBLE
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 25.02.2020 under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [in short “the Act”] for the Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. Delay condoned.
On perusal of the records, it is observed that the assessee was afforded sufficient opportunities of hearing given by the Assessing Officer, but the assessee failed to furnish requisite explanations and reply before the AO. Consequently, the Ld. CIT(A), based on the material available on record, upheld Asst. Year: 2016-17 - 2– the action of the AO and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. We also find that the assessee remained non-compliant before the AO and failed to furnish requisite documentary evidence to substantiate his claim. Before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed that one more opportunity may be given, all necessary details, clarifications, and explanations would be furnished before the revenue authorities. Hence, in the interest of justice, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to the AO for de novo adjudication. The assessee shall submit all the relevant details and documents before the AO without seeking any unnecessary adjournments.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
The order is pronounced in the open Court on 23.01.2026. (SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE) VICE-PRESIDENT Surat; Dated 23.01.2026 **SAMANTA आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
The Appellant
The Respondent.
Concerned CIT
The CIT(A)-
DR, ITAT, Surat
Guard file.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, //// सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.
