DCIT, CHENNAI vs. AMEC FOSTER WHEELER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that telecommunication expenses must be excluded from both export turnover and total turnover to maintain consistency in the computation of deduction under Section 10A. The CIT(A)'s order was confirmed.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning the Assessment Year 2010-11. The core issue was the exclusion of telecommunication expenses from both export turnover and total turnover for Section 10A deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether telecommunication expenses should be excluded from both export turnover and total turnover for the purpose of calculating deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A) -1, Chennai dated 09.03.2016 and pertains to Assessment Year 2010-11.
The only issue arises for consideration is exclusion of telecommunication expenses both from export turnover and total turnover for the purpose of computation of deduction under Section 10A of the Act.
Shri A.V.Sreekanth, the learned department representative submitted that the assessing officer executed telecommunication expenses from the export turnover. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(A) by placing reliance on the special bench decision of this Tribunal, directed the assessing officer to exclude the telecommunication expenses from the export turnover also.
According to the learned representative, the revenue has already filed an appeal against the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Sak Soft Limited reported in 313 ITR (AT) 353 (Chennai) and the same is pending. Therefore, to keep the matter alive, the revenue filed the appeal before this Tribunal.
We heard Shri Sriram Seshadri, the learned representative for the assessee also. The learned representative for the assessee submitted that for the purpose of computing eligible deduction under Section 10A, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the denominator and numerator shall be of the same factor. Once the telecommunication expenses included in the total turnover, the same shall also be included in the export turnover. However, the assessing officer included the telecommunication expenses in the export turnover and excluded the same from the total turnover. Therefore, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the CIT(A) has rightly found that the telecommunication expenses has to be excluded both from the export turnover and the total turnover. Therefore, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the CIT(A) and accordingly, the same is confirmed.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed.
Order pronounced on 23rd September, 2016 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026