No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘SMC’, KOLKATA
Before: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]
ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, JM:
This appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order dated 22.02.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax, Appeal, ADDL/JCIT (A)-1, Pune [hereinafter referred to as ‘the ‘ld. CIT(A)’].
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the order of the ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte without considering various grounds taken by the assessee and nothing has been dealt on merits except reiterating assessment order on the disallowances/additions made by the ld. AO. The assessee could not get any opportunity to file its submissions and other relevant details. Moreover, the ld. AR stated that while passing the impugned order, ld. CIT(A) without considering the condonation of delay of 85 days in filing the appeal by the assessee before him. Although, in this regard assessee has filed an affidavit in support of its claim by stating that impugned order was served on 28.03.2018 along with a copy of letter dated 23.03.2018 issued from the office of ITO, Ward-1(1), Kolkata where it was clearly stated that the ld. AO has failed to sent the records to the correct address in first
M/s. Regal Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. place and also failed to take ameliorative measure even after noticing the whole grounds. Thus, the assessee referring to grounds of the appeal, it has prayed that grounds raised in the instant appeal may be restored to the ld. CIT(A) for adjudicating afresh after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard condoning the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee.
Per contra, ld. DR was fair enough not to oppose this request of the ld. counsel for the assessee.
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. Through grounds, the assessee has stated that ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the materials on record and passed the order ex-parte. On perusal of the impugned order, we noticed that the instant ground raised by the assessee has merit as in the impugned order, ld. CIT(A) merely passed by dismissing the appeal of the assessee. As the assessee in the instant case could not file necessary details as well as submissions at the time of hearing before the ld. CIT(A) and it is an ex-parte order without considering condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Under these given facts and circumstances, we condone the delay of 85 days in filing the appeal before ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter in the instant appeal to the file of ld. CIT(A) for adjudication afresh by passing a speaking order after considering the submission made by the assessee and while doing so reasonable opportunity of being heard should be provided to assessee. The assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and file necessary documents in support of its grounds of appeal and should not take any further adjournment, unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. In case after providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee,
M/s. Regal Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd. there is no compliance before the ld. CIT(A), then the ld. CIT(A) may proceed to pass the order in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.