GAURAV VINOD NEVATIA,MUMBAI vs ACIT 21(2), MUMBAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G”, BENCH MUMBAI

For Appellant: Shri Bharat M Pathak

For Respondent: Shri Jeevanlal Lavedia

Hearing: 04/10/2016Pronounced: 05/10/2016

O R D E R PER R.C.SHARMA (A.M): This is an appeal filed by the assessee against order of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2010-2011 in the matter of order passed under Section 143(3) of the I.T.Act.

The only grievance of assessee relate to disallowance of Rs.22,20,420/- under Section 14A. It was contended by learned AR that AO had made disallowance under Section 14A in respect of shares held as stock in trade. He relied on the decision of Bombay High Court in of 2013 dated 17/03/2015 in case of India Advantage Securities Ltd., and also Karnataka High Court in case of CCL Limited wherein it was held that no disallowance under Section 14A is warranted in respect of shares held as stock in trade.

2 (A.Y.2010-11 (Shri Gaurav Vinod Nevatia) 3. We have considered rival contention and found that the disallowance has been made by AO under Section 14A in a routine manner. In view of the decision of the Bombay High Court and Karnataka High Court as referred above, no disallowance is required to be made in respect of shares held as stock in trade. Respectfully following the decision of the jurisdictional High Court, we restore the matter back to the file of the AO for excluding the shares held as stock in trade while computing disallowance under Section 14A. We direct accordingly.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

GAURAV VINOD NEVATIA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 21(2), MUMBAI