M/S GODAVARI DEALCOM PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. THE CIT - I, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the assessee's appeal as there was no objection from the Revenue. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2009-10. At the time of hearing, the assessee did not appear.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to non-appearance and no objection from the Revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA
Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi
आदेश /O R D E R
PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member:-
This appeal has been filed by the assessee relating to Assessment Year 2009-10 is directed against the order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kolkata u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide his order dated 10.02.2014.
At the time of hearing none appeared on behalf of assessee though an application dated 06.01.2017 filed by assessee regarding withdrawal of its appeal and Shri Niraj Kumar, Ld. Departmental Representative represented on behalf of Revenue has not objected the withdrawal of the same. A.Y. 2009-10 M/s Godavari Dealcom Pvt.. Ltd. Vs. CIT-1 Kol. Page 2 3. As there is no objection from the Revenue, we permit the withdrawal of assessee’s appeal. Accordingly, this appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawal.
In the result, assessee’s appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open court on 19/01/2017
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.Viswanethra Ravi) (Waseem Ahmed) Judicial Member Accountant Member *Dkp, Sr.P.S �दनांकः- 19/01/2017 कोलकाता / Kolkata आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant-M/s Godavari Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. AG-112, Sector-II Suite No.804 & 805, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-91 2. ��यथ�/Respondent-CIT,Kolkata-1, 7th Floor, P-7, Chowringhee Sq., Kol-69 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026