M/S DHANTERASH SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOLKATA-2, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 635/KOL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 January 2017AY 2010-20112 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee's counsel, on instructions, requested to withdraw the appeal as the assessee did not wish to press it. The Revenue did not object to this request.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal arose from a revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 263 of the Act. The original assessment was framed under Section 143(3)/147 for the Assessment Year 2010-11.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri N. V. Vasudevan, JM & Shri M. Balaganesh, AM]

Hearing: 25.01.2017Pronounced: 25.01.2017

ORDER

Per Shri M. Balaganesh, AM:

1.

This appeal by assessee is arising out of revision order of Pr. CIT, Kolkata-2, Kolkata passed u/s. 263 of the Act vide No. Pr.CIT-2/DC(Hq)-2/Kol/263/2014-15/5861- 64 dated 20.03.2015. Assessment was framed by ITO, Ward-6(1), Kolkata u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for Assessment Year 2010-11 vide his order dated 30.04.2012.

2.

At the time of hearing Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal as the assessee does not want to press the appeal and accordingly, he prayed before the bench to treat the appeal as withdrawn. Ld. Sr. DR has not raised any objection to this prayer for withdrawal. Hence, we permit the withdrawal and dismiss this appeal of assessee as withdrawn. 3. In the result, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (N. V. Vasudevan) (M. Balaganesh) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 25th January, 2017 Jd.(Sr.P.S.)

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →