DINESH CHAND MAHESHWARI,MEERUT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), MEERUT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had adopted the DTVSV-2024 scheme and had applied for withdrawal of the appeal. The departmental representative had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2014-15 against an order under Section 147 r.w.s. 144. The case was called twice, and the assessee remained absent, leading to an ex-parte proceeding. Subsequently, the assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is allowed to withdraw the appeal after proceedings have commenced and the assessee has chosen to remain absent?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman
Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Dinesh Chand Maheshwari, Vs ACIT, Maheshwari Associates, Rithani Delhi Circle-1(1)(1), Road, Meerut-250002 Meerut-250002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAJPC0109R Assessee by: None Revenue by : Sh. Jitender Singh, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 10.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 10.11.2025 ORDER Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2014-15, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1070328301(1) dated 13.11.2024, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
“Sir, In response to your notice dated 17.09.2025. The above case is fixed for 10 Nov-2025 against the appeal filed before your honour on date 10.01.2025. Your honour is between the appellant has adopted the scheme DTVSV-2024, where the demand tax under this scheme thereon had already been deposited by the appellant accordingly this scheme (DTVSV- 2024). That now the appellant have decided to withdraw appeal before your honour. In support of withdraw appeal the Affidavit by the appellant (where he has declared that he has decided to withdraw appeal sumoto), and Form No. 3 and Form No. 4 under the DTVSV Scheme 2024 are also enclosed herewith. Now it may kindly request you and pray before your honour please allow the appellant to withdraw the appeal.”
Learned departmental representative submits that he has no objection to the instant withdrawal application per se. Ordered accordingly.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026