ITO, CHENNAI vs. M/S. LIBERTY AGRI PRODUCTS PVT.LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal as withdrawn in view of the CBDT circular regarding appeals with a tax effect below Rs 10 lakhs. Consequently, the cross-objections filed by the assessee were also dismissed as not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee pointed out that the tax effect in the departmental appeal was less than Rs 10 lakhs, as per CBDT circular. The Departmental Representative verified the computation and did not dispute the assessee's submission.
What were the issues?
Whether the departmental appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to a tax effect below the threshold stipulated in the CBDT circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI D BENCH, CHENNAI
[2] Learned Departmental Representative, having perused the details filed by the assessee and having verified the same, does not dispute the submissions of the assessee. We have also seen the computation and we find it prima facie in order.
[3] In view of the above factual position, and in view of the CBDT instructions (supra) to the effect that the appeals filed by the income tax department before this Tribunal, involving tax effect of less than RS 10 lakhs will not be pursued, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn [4] As for the cross objections filed by the assessee, as the appeal itself is dismissed as withdrawn, the cross objections filed by the assessee are dismissed as not maintainable. In any event, these cross objections donot contain any grievance requiring specific adjudication on merits.
[5 In the result, the appeal as also the cross objections are dismissed. Pronounced in the open court today on 4th day of November, 2016
Sd/- sd/- G Pavan Kumar Pramod Kumar (Judicial Member) (Accountant Member)
Chennai, the 4th day of November, 2016.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026