PRADEEP KUMAR SARA,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR. 9(1), KOLKATA

Pradeep Kumar Saraf …. Appellant (PAN: AJJPS2454G) Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax .… Respondent Circle-9(1), Kolkata. Appearances by: N o n e appeared for Appellant. Shri Partha Pratim Barman, Addl. CIT appeared for Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : 15.07.2024 Date of pronouncing the order : 25.07.2024 ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2017-18 is directed against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in short the “Act”) by Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short Ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 23.03.2024 arising out of the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act by ACIT, Circle-9(1),Kolkata dated 18.11.2019.

Pradeep Kumar Saraf AY : 2017-18 3. At the time of hearing I find that the assessee failed to get sufficient opportunity to adduce evidence before the Ld. CIT(A) in support of his contention to explain the source of cash deposit of Rs.11,35,000/-. Hence, I consider it necessary to set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to his file for fresh adjudication after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard and direct the assessee to file necessary evidence and documents in support of his submission. If the additional evidence are filed then Ld. CIT(A) is directed to obtain remand report from the Ld. AO. Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.