M/S. VAACHI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR- 7(2)/KOLKATA. , KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order was ex-parte and the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to present its case. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the AO for fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against an ex-parte order from the CIT(A) was heard by the ITAT. The assessee had not appeared before the AO or CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders.
What were the issues?
Whether the appellate order passed without providing the assessee sufficient opportunity of being heard is bad in law. Whether the disallowance of purchase of material by SEZ units was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA
Appearances by: Assessee represented by : None Department represented by : Subhendu Datta, CIT-DR Date of concluding the hearing : August 20, 2024 Date of pronouncing the order : August 21, 2024
ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the Assessment Year (in short ‘AY’) 2010-11 is directed against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 22.12.2023 arising out of Assessment Order dated 17.08.2015, passed under Section 263/143(3) of the Act.
2. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
M/s Vaachi International Pvt. Ltd. “1. For the assessment order and appellate order passed without providing the assessee sufficient opportunity of being heard is bad in law.
For that the assessment order passed by the Ld. AO u/s 143(3)/263 contrary to the direction of the Ld. PCIT is bad in law.
For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the Ld. AO of disallowing the entire purchase of material by the SEZ Units of the assessee.
For that even otherwise, the disallowance made by the AO and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) is arbitrary and excessive.
For that the appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete all or any of the grounds of appeal
.”
3. At the time of hearing, no one turned up before this Bench although notices were issued time to time from registry, from perusal of the order sheet, it is reflected that on 10.04.2024 and 14.05.2024, one Shri Abhishak Bansal, AR of the assessee had appeared before the Bench and sought time by seeking adjournment in the case. However, today when the matter is called up no one turn up on behalf of the assessee. Therefore, we have no other alternative but to decide the appeal on merits of the case with the assistance of Ld. DR. The Ld. DR stated that while framing the assessment order, assessee did not appear before the Ld. AO and the order was passed ex-parte against the assessee and even before Ld. CIT(A) assessee did not appear, therefore, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed.
4. Dissatisfied with the above order, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. The first ground of appeal raised by the assessee is that the appellate order was passed by the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order. Therefore, another opportunity may be given to the assessee so that assessee can represent its case properly before the authority below.
5. We after hearing the submission of the Ld. DR and perusing the material available on record, we find that the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order and the assessee did not get opportunity to 2 M/s Vaachi International Pvt. Ltd. represent its case properly before the authority below although notices were issued time to time to the assessee, we after considering the facts of the case, find that interest of natural justice and fair play to the parties it is necessary to remand back the instant issue to the file of AO with a direction to re-examine the issue afresh after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld. AO as and when notice will be served and submit such necessary documents before him in order to substantiate its claim. In case assessee will not appear before the AO that event Ld. AO may pass appropriate order in accordance with law. In terms of the above, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 21st August, 2024.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026