PAWAN HANS LIMITED,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 19(2), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that if the Assessing Officer merely adopted the income as assessed in the Section 143(1) intimation in the Section 143(3) assessment order without independent discussion or adjudication, the intimation does not merge with the assessment order. Therefore, a separate appeal against the intimation remains maintainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s order dismissing their appeal, which had challenged an intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) held that the appeal was not maintainable as the Section 143(1) intimation merged with the subsequent assessment order under Section 143(3).
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against an intimation under Section 143(1) is maintainable when a regular assessment under Section 143(3) has also been made, and if the former merges with the latter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 143(4),Section 246A,Section 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI M BALAGANESH
PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Addl./JCIT (Appeals)-2, Bangalore dated 10.01.2025 for the AY 2018- 19 in dismissing the appeal of the assessee holding that the order passed u/s 143(1) is merged with the regular assessment made u/s 143(3) of the Act and therefore the intimation does not have legs to 1 PAWAN HANS LIMITED, NOIDA stand on its own once the regular assessment proceedings are initiated and the appeal against the intimation/order u/
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026