ELANTHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,ELANTHOOR vs. ITO, WARD -2, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the substantial additions and the assessee's explanation of unavoidable circumstances, granted one final opportunity for the assessee to present evidence. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative bank, filed a nil income return. During assessment, it failed to provide requested information and documents, leading to significant additions by the Assessing Officer. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity to present its case and evidence, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI SONJOY SARMA
BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2022-23 Elanthoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.………………..…..….……….Appellant Elanthoor SCB Building, Elanthoor, P.O Pathanamthitta, Kerala – 689643. [PAN:AAAAE1867C] vs. ITO, Ward-2, Thiruvalla……..……….....................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri T. T. Biju, Adv, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Smt. Leena Lal, Snr AR, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing: June 04, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order: July 31, 2025 ORDER
Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dated 24.03.2025 for the assessment year 2022-23.
Brief Facts of the Case are that the assessee, is Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative Society / EOU / Firm], filed its return of income declaring nil income for the assessment year 2022-23. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. During assessment proceedings, a notice under section 142(1) was issued, calling for detailed information, including: Break-up and nature of loans and advances (whether in cash or kind); Total outstanding advances amounting to Rs.28,11,45,433/-; Party-wise details with name, address, PAN, email, payment details; Copies of bank statements highlighting relevant transactions. However, the assessee failed to furnish the required information and supporting
Elanthoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd evidence including books of accounts, ledgers, or confirmation of parties. Consequently, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3), making significant additions and assessed the total income at 343,10,50,699. 43,1056,991/-
Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A), which was dismissed, confirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
Aggrieved by the above order assessee is appeal before this tribunal, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that the assessee could not present the books of accounts or relevant documents during the assessment proceeding due to unavoidable circumstances. It was submitted that a reasonable opportunity should be granted to produce all supporting evidence before the Assessing Officer and substantiate its claim, including the eligibility for deduction under Section 80Pof the Act.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative supported the orders of the lower authorities.
We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the materials available on record. In the present case, it is evident that the assessment was framed after making substantial additions due to the assessee's failure to comply with statutory notices and failure to produce the books of accounts and supporting records. At the same time, considering the quantum of additions and the explanation now provided by the assessee, we are of the view that one final opportunity should be granted in the interest of natural justice to enable the assessee to properly represent its case and submit the necessary documentary evidence, including books of accounts, party confirmations, and bank statements. Accordingly, we set aside the orders of the lower authorities and restore the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer with a direction
Elanthoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd to examine the issue afresh after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is also directed to fully cooperate and produce all relevant documents to substantiate its claims.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
31st July, 2025
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Subhash Chand Saini, Jaipur vs ITO Ward, Behror, BherorITA 36/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026