M/S. SALARPURIA HOMES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is not permissible if no exempt income is earned by the assessee. The amendment by the Finance Act, 2022, is prospective and cannot be applied retrospectively.
What were the facts?
The assessee company had investments in equity shares, but earned no exempt income during the assessment year. The Assessing Officer disallowed expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D can be made in the absence of exempt income. Applicability of the Finance Act, 2022 amendment to Section 14A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing61 Taxmann.com 118 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.579 citing372 ITR 97 · 2014 · HC
- Redington (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT370 citing392 ITR 633 · 2017 · HC
- PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.354 citing141 Taxmann.com 289 · 2022 · HC
- PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd.255 citing84 Taxmann.com 186 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Shivam Motors (P.) Ltd.179 citing55 Taxmann.com 262 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc.145 citing226 Taxmann 48 · 2014 · HC
- PCIT v. M/s Era51 citing288 Taxmann 384 · 2022 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Avantha Realty Ltd.35 citing164 Taxmann.com 376 · 2024 · HC
- Trib.), (ii) PCIT v. Vardhman Chemtech (P.) Ltd.11 citing423 ITR 241 · 2020 · HC
- Eveready Industries India Ltd. v. PCIT9 citing114 Taxmann.com 610 · 2020
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA
Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the Assessment Year (in short ‘AY’) 2014-15 is directed against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) by the Addl./JCIT(A)-13, Mumbai, dated 27.05.2024 arising out of Assessment Order dated 14.12.2016, passed under Section 143(3) of the Act.
The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: M/s Salarpuria Homes Pvt
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026