SRI.M.HUSSAIN,KOLLAM vs. THE DCIT, KOLLAM

PDF
ITA 19/COCH/2021Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 August 2024AY 2007-08Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI AMARJIT SINGH (Accountant Member)4 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH : COCHIN

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH

Hearing: 20.08.2024Pronounced: 23.08.2024

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH : COCHIN

BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Sl.No. ITA.No. Name of the Name of the Order Appealed against Proceedings ALONG WITH Assessee Respondent CIT(A), Kochi-3, Kochi’s involved u/sec. S.A.No. A.Y. Appeal No./DIN & Order No. of the Income ITBA/APL/S/250/2020-21 Tax Act, 1961 (in short the "Act") 1. 19/COCH./2021 2007-08 143(3) ITA.No.3,4,1,30,29,28/KLM/C r.w.s.153C IT(A)-III/2014-15, dated 10.11.2020 2. 20/COCH./2021 2012-13 Shri M. 1028547167(1) dated 143(3) 10.11.2020 Hussain, K.P. 3. 21/COCH./2021 2012-13 1028547167(1) dated 143(3) 10.11.2020 House, 4. 22/COCH./2021 2010-11 ITA.No.3,4,1,30,29,28/KLM/C 143(3) Palliserickal The DCIT, IT(A)-III/2014-15, dated r.w.s.153C 10.11.2020 P.O. Central 5. 23/COCH./2021 2011- 1028547167(1) dated 143(3) 12/2012- 10.11.2020 Sasthamcotta Circle-1, 13 in CIT , KOLLAM KOLLAM Order 6. 24/COCH./2021 2012-13 143(3) PIN 690521 ITA.No.3,4,1,30,29,28/KLM/C r.w.s.153C IT(A)-III/2014-15, dated PAN ABIPH0110P 10.11.2020 . KERALA 1 to 6 S.A.Nos.4 to 2007-08, 9/COCH./2021 2010-11 to 2012- 13

For Assessee : Shri Anil D. Nair, Advocate For Revenue : Shri Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR & Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. DR

Date of Hearing : 20.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 23.08.2024

ORDER PER BENCH :

The instant batch of six main appeals and as many stay

applications pertains to a single assessee herein namely Shri M.

Hussain. All other relevant details stand duly tabulated

hereinabove.

2 ITA.Nos.19 to 24 & SA.Nos.4 to 9/COCH./2021 Heard both the parties. Case files perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset with the able assistance

coming from both the sides that we are dealing with the

impugned sec.153C rw.s.143(3) assessments wherein the

relevant search had been carried-out on 22.09.2011 in case of

M/s. AR Bangles, Kollam. Learned assessing authority in

assessee’s case appears to have set sec.153C mechanism in

motion by recording it’s satisfaction on 10.12.2012 which finally

culminated in all these six assessments for assessment years

2007-2008 to 2012-2013. It is thus clear that the impugned

former four assessment years herein from assessment year 2007-

2008 to 2010-2011 in fact involve “unabated” assessments which

have to be strictly based on the relevant seized material found

during the course of search as per PCIT vs. AbhisarBuildwell P.

Ltd.,[2023] 454 ITR 212 (SC).

3.

The Revenue could hardly pinpoint any such specific

material in all these four assessment years which could form the

basis on the addition(s) made in assessee’s hands. We thus find

force in the assessee’s instant first and foremost legal argument/

ground(s) in his former impugned sec.153C assessments in

assessment years 2007-2008 to 2010-2011 forming subject

3 ITA.Nos.19 to 24 & SA.Nos.4 to 9/COCH./2021 matter of adjudication in ITA.Nos.19 to 22/Coch./2021. These

appeals are allowed in very terms.

4.

We now left with the assessee’s latter twin appeals

ITA.Nos.23 and 24/Coch./2021 involving “abated” assessments

which could indeed be finalised in light of the entire material

seeing light of the day only during the course of scrutiny. Learned

senior counsel is fair enough in not disputing the fact that the

impugned twin abated assessments are indeed based on the

relevant material examined during the course of sec.143(3)

r.w.s.153C detailed scrutiny and therefore, we find no merit

either in assessee’s submissions on legality or on merits; as the

case may be. These latter twin appeals ITA.Nos.23 and

24/Coch.2021 are dismissed. Ordered accordingly.

No other ground or argument has been pressed before

us during the course of hearing.

5.

To sum-up, these assessee’s former four

appealsITA.Nos.19 to 22/Coch./2021 are allowed and latter twin

appeals ITA.Nos.23 and 24/Coch.2021 are dismissed in above

terms. His corresponding stay applications S.A. Nos.4 to

4 ITA.Nos.19 to 24 & SA.Nos.4 to 9/COCH./2021 9/COCH./2021stand rendered academic. A copy of this common

order be placed in the respective case files.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 23.08.2024

Sd/- Sd/- [AMARJIT SINGH] [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Cochin, Dated 23rdAugust, 2024

VBP/-

Copy to

1.

The appellant 2. The respondent 3. The CIT(A) concerned. 4. The CIT concerned 5. The D.R. ITAT, Cochin Bench, Cochin. 6. Guard File.

//By Order//

//True copy//

Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Cochin Bench, Cochin

SRI.M.HUSSAIN,KOLLAM vs THE DCIT, KOLLAM | BharatTax