Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION No.46552 OF 2018 (S-CAT)
BETWEEN:
CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
REVENUE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
... PETITIONERS (BY SMT. M.C. NAGASHREE, ADV.)
AND:
SRI.U.A. CHANDRAMOULI S/O LATE U.ASWATHANARAYANAIAH, R/AT NO.32,1ST CROSS,
2 20TH MAIN, BRM LAYOUT 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 068.
CHAIRMAN UNION PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION, DHOLPUR HOUSE,SHAHJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 069
INQUIRY OFFICER & COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(DRP) C R BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001 REP. BY SRI OM PRAKASH YADAV
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M.V.SESHACHALA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W. SRI.ARVIND V.CHAVAN, ADV. FOR R1;)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH IN O.A.NO.170/00055/2017 DATED 08.11.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE - C ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER
Smt. M.C.Nagashree, learned counsel for the petitioners.
3 Sri M.V.Seshachala, learned senior counsel along with Sri Arvind V. Chavan, learned counsel for respondents.
In this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are inter alia have assailed the validity of the order dated 08.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru in Original Application No.170/55/2017, by which the said application preferred by respondent No.1 has been allowed.
When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the parties submitted that the controversy in the instant petition is squarely covered by the order of the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.Nos.16987- 16988 of 2018.
In view of the aforesaid submission and for the reasons assigned by the Division Bench of this Court in the aforesaid decision, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order dated 08.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.170/55/2017.
In the result, the writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE nvj