ENERGY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-12(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(A). The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeal on its merits after providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex parte because the notice for hearing was not served. The assessee could not appear for the hearing due to this lack of proper notice.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex parte decision of the CIT(A) was justified without proper service of notice and whether the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM]
ORDER
Per Shri Rajesh Kumar, AM
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-3, Gurugram dated 26.12.2023 for AY 2012-13 arising out of assessment order passed u/s. 144/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) by DCIT, Circle-12(1), Kolkata dated 28.12.2019.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted before the Bench that appeal has been decided by first appellate authority ex parte without deciding the issues on merit as the assessee could not appear on the date appointed for hearing because the notice issued by the Ld. CIT(A) was not served. The Ld. AR, therefore, prayed that in the interest of justice and fair play the appeal may kindly be restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to decide the same on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee which would be in accordance with the provisions of section 250(6) of the Act which requires the first appellate authority to state the point for determination and decision thereon and reason for arriving at such decision. Accordingly, we restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to decide the same on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose Order is pronounced in the open court on 15th October, 2024
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026