M/S GRYPHONS INDIA CONSTRUCTIONS,KOZHIKODE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), KOZHIKODE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 262/COCH/2023Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 September 2024AY 2014-15Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri Soundararajan K. (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found sufficient cause for the assessee's non-appearance before the CIT(A) due to the circumstances of their counsel. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the issue was remanded for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A) due to the ill-health and subsequent death of their authorized representative. The CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the AO. The assessee's counsel requested restoration of the issue for fresh adjudication.

What were the issues?

Whether there was a sufficient cause for the assessee's non-appearance before the CIT(A) and if the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Joshy N. Thomas, Advocate
For Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 23.09.2024Pronounced: 26.09.2024

Appellant by: Shri Joshy N. Thomas, Advocate Respondent by: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 23.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 26.09.2024 O R D E R Per Bench This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 17.02.2023 for Assessment Year (AY)2014-15.

2.

At the outset, we note that the assessee failed to appear during the appellate proceedings. Therefore, in the absence of any cooperation from the side of the assessee, the learned CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) for Rs.25,00,000/- during the assessment proceedings to the total income of the assessee. However, the learned counsel for the assessee before us submitted that the authorized representative of the assessee could not appear during the appellate proceeding due to his ill-health on account of failure of Kidneys. Furthermore, the learned counsel for the assessee has eventually passed away. Thus, it was submitted Gryphons India Constructions by the learned A.R. that there was genuine reason which prevented the assessee or his counsel from making necessary compliance during the appellate proceedings. Accordingly, the learned A.R. prayed to restore the issue to the file of the AO with the direction to admit the ground of appeal of the assessee and adjudicate the same in accordance with the provisions of law.

3. On the other hand, the learned Sr. DR raised no objection if the matter is set aside to the file of the learned CIT(A) for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law.

4.

We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the materials available on record. Considering the ill-health of the learned counsel for the assessee during the appellate proceedings and eventually death of the ld. counsel, we find that there was sufficient cause on the part of the assessee for non-appearance before the learned CIT(A). Accordingly, we set aside the findings and remand the issue back to the learned CIT(A) for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →