CCNR,KALYANI, NADIA vs. ITO, WARD 41(1), NADIA, A.H. MITRA ROAD, NEDIAR PARA, KRISHNANAGAR, NADIA

PDF
ITA 240/KOL/2024Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 October 2024Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA

Before: SHRI SONJOY SARMA & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI

Hearing: 21.08.2024Pronounced: 22.10.2024

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 239/KOL/2024 ITA No. 240/KOL/2024

CCNR, Kalyani, Nadia, ITO, Ward 41(1), Nadia, C/p. CA R.S. Poonia, D-82-B, Ananta Hari Mitra Road, Siwad Area, Krishna Marg, Vs Nediar Para, Kishna Nagar, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur - 302015 Nadia - 741101 (PAN: AACTC9362M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Present for: Appellant by : None Respondent by : A. Kundu, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 21.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 22.10.2024 O R D E R PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. These are a batch of two appeals pertaining to orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(E)’] as under:

(i) ITA No. 239/Kol/2024 :- Order u/s 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”), and

(ii) ITA No. 240/Kol/2024 – Order u/s 80G of the Act.

In both these cases the Appellant has challenged the action of Ld. CIT(E), Kolkata, in rejecting the assesse’s applications u/s 12AB(1)(b) and section 80G(5)(iii) of the Act respectively in ITA Nos. 239 & 240/Kol/2024.

2 ITA No. 239-240/Kol/2024 CCNR, Kalyani, Nadia 1.1 With the help of Ld. DR the facts were gone through and it was pointed out that notices sent for eliciting response from the assessee trust were not responded to. Accordingly, the applications filed u/s 12AB(1)(b) and 80G(5)(iii) of the Act were rejected.

2.

Aggrieved with these actions, the Appellant trust is in appeal before us, with grounds of appeal, in both cases, challenging the outright rejection of said applications.

2.1 As mentioned earlier, this matter was considered with the help of Ld. DR and it is felt that the Appellant deserves another chance to establish his bonafides before the Ld. CIT(E), Kolkata. In light of this, this matter is remanded back to the Ld. CIT(E), Kolkata for considering the case of the assessee afresh. The Appellant would do well to present the facts before the Ld. CIT(E) by promptly attending to hearing opportunities.

3.

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd October, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (Sonjoy Sarma) (Sanjay Awasthi) Judicial Member Accountant Member

Dated: 22nd October, 2024 AK, P.S.

3 ITA No. 239-240/Kol/2024 CCNR, Kalyani, Nadia Copy to: 1. The Appellant: 2. The Respondent. 3. CIT(A) 4. The CIT, 5. DR, ITAT, Kolkata Bench, Kolkata //True Copy// By Order

Assistant Registrar ITAT, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata

CCNR,KALYANI, NADIA vs ITO, WARD 41(1), NADIA, A.H. MITRA ROAD, NEDIAR PARA, KRISHNANAGAR, NADIA | BharatTax