DIRGHAGRAM KHARAKPUR SKUS LTD.,PASCHIM MEDNIPUR vs. PCIT - 13, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal, after hearing both parties and considering the circumstances, allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee later decided not to pursue the appeal as an order had already been passed pursuant to the revision order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeal against a Section 263 order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SONJOY SARMA & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
आदेश/O R D E R PER SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2018-19 is directed against the order passed by the Learned Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-13 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ld. PCIT’) dated 7th March, 2024 passed u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), which is arising out of the assessment order u/s 143(3) read with section 144B of the Act dated 28th May, 2021.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the instant appeal has been instructed by his client to be withdrawn. The appeal was initially filed challenging the order
The ld. Counsel for the assessee also filed a formal application requesting withdrawal of the appeal.
On the other hand, ld. DR has raised no objection to this withdrawal
We after hearing the submission of both the parties and considering the circumstances, we find it appropriate to allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Therefore, the instant appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 23rd October, 2024 at Kolkata.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026