SWARUP DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-50(1), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 809/KOL/2024Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 October 2024AY 2020-21Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member), Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the facts regarding the land's agricultural nature were not examined by the lower authorities. Therefore, the issue was restored to the AO for fresh examination and decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed exemption on profit from sale of land, stating it was agricultural. The AO made an addition of Rs. 27,44,000/-. The assessee provided a certificate from the local Panchayat indicating the land was agricultural and outside city limits.

What were the issues?

Whether the profit on sale of land is taxable as capital gains or exempt as agricultural income, and whether the CIT(A) order was passed ex-parte without proper hearing.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

ORDER / आदेश Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 22.03.2023 for the AY 2020-21.

2.

At the outset, we observe that the assessee has challenged the ex-parte order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) without giving any hearing thereby violating the principles of natural justice and fair play. After perusing the facts on record, we note that the AO Assessment Year: 2020-21 Swarup Das has made addition of Rs. 27,44,000/- which represented the profit on sale of land which was claimed by the assessee as exempt on account of land being agricultural. The Counsel of the assessee has furnished a certificate form the local Panchayat to the effect that the distance of land is more than 8 km form the local limits of the city and accordingly the said land is not liable to be taxed under the Income Tax Act. We note that the said facts were not before the authorities below and were not examined at all, Therefore, we are restoring the issue back to the file of AO with the direction to examine the same and decide the issue afresh accordingly. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. 3.

Order is pronounced in the open court on 24th October, 2024

Sd/- Sd/- (Pradip Kumar Choubey /�द�प कुमार चौबे) (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Dated: 24th October, 2024 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Swarup Das, 24, Santi Niwas, Tustu Babu Road, Kancharapara, North 24 Parganas-734145 2. Respondent – ITO, Ward-50(1), Kolkata 3. Ld. CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi 4. Ld. Pr. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →