SWARUP DAS,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-50(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the facts regarding the land's agricultural nature were not examined by the lower authorities. Therefore, the issue was restored to the AO for fresh examination and decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption on profit from sale of land, stating it was agricultural. The AO made an addition of Rs. 27,44,000/-. The assessee provided a certificate from the local Panchayat indicating the land was agricultural and outside city limits.
What were the issues?
Whether the profit on sale of land is taxable as capital gains or exempt as agricultural income, and whether the CIT(A) order was passed ex-parte without proper hearing.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]
ORDER / आदेश Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 22.03.2023 for the AY 2020-21.
At the outset, we observe that the assessee has challenged the ex-parte order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) without giving any hearing thereby violating the principles of natural justice and fair play. After perusing the facts on record, we note that the AO Assessment Year: 2020-21 Swarup Das has made addition of Rs. 27,44,000/- which represented the profit on sale of land which was claimed by the assessee as exempt on account of land being agricultural. The Counsel of the assessee has furnished a certificate form the local Panchayat to the effect that the distance of land is more than 8 km form the local limits of the city and accordingly the said land is not liable to be taxed under the Income Tax Act. We note that the said facts were not before the authorities below and were not examined at all, Therefore, we are restoring the issue back to the file of AO with the direction to examine the same and decide the issue afresh accordingly. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. 3.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 24th October, 2024
Sd/- Sd/- (Pradip Kumar Choubey /�द�प कुमार चौबे) (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Dated: 24th October, 2024 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Swarup Das, 24, Santi Niwas, Tustu Babu Road, Kancharapara, North 24 Parganas-734145 2. Respondent – ITO, Ward-50(1), Kolkata 3. Ld. CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi 4. Ld. Pr. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026