KODANCHERY PANCHAYATH VANITH CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO.D- 2853,KOZHIKODE vs. WARD 2(3) KOZHIKODE , KOZHIKODE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 143(1)(a)(v) by the Finance Act, 2021, which allowed disallowance of Chapter VI-A deductions, had prospective effect from April 1, 2021. Therefore, it could not be applied to AY 2019-20.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for AY 2019-20. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim during processing under Section 143(1)(a)(v) of the Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of Section 80P deduction under Section 143(1)(a)(v) was valid for AY 2019-20, considering the prospective nature of the amendment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 143(1)(a)(v),Section 139(1),Section 80AC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh
Appellant by: Shri Johnson George, CA Respondent by: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 13.08.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 25.09.2024 O R D E R Per Bench This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2019-20 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)]’s DIN & Order No. ITBA/ NFAC/S/250/2023- 24/1058297939(1) dated 29.11.2023 in proceedings u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
Heard Both the parties. Case file perused.
It emerges during the course of hearing at the outset that there is hardly any need for us to delve with the relevant factual matrix at length once it has come on record that both the learned lower authorities, more particularly, Assessing Officer [DCIT-CPC, Bangalore], have disallowed the assessee’s sec.80P deduction claim Kodanchery Panchayath Vanitha Co-op. Society Ltd. involving “processing” u/sec.143(1)(a)(v) of the Act. This is for the precise reason that the Finance Act, 2021 had in fact inserted the necessary amendment to this effect w.e.f. 01.04.2021 carrying prospective operation only whereas we are in assessment year 2018-2019.
This tribunal’s recent coordinate bench order in ITA.No.62/NAG/2022 ITO vs. Nagpur Zilla Parishad Primary Shikshah Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Nagpur has rejected the Revenue’s very contentions as under : “3. Learned CIT-DR vehemently reiterated the Revenue’s above extracted pleadings that the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in holding the assessee eligible for it’s sec.80P deduction despite the fact that it had not filed it’s return within the “due date” prescribed u/sec.139(1) of the Act. Mr. Kanojiya referred to sec.80AC (ii) that the same is in the nature of a mandatory provision which disentitles the assessee from claiming sec.80P deduction and therefore, the CPC’s processing dated 29.05.2020 herein had rightly rejected the assessee’s claim u/sec.143(1)(a)(v) of the Act.
4. We find no merit in the Revenue’s instant sole substantive grievance canvassed herein as sec.143(1)(a)(v); for the purpose of disallowing the impugned claim under Chapter-VIA of the Act; has been inserted by the Finance Act 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 carries prospective effect only whereas the assessment year before us is assessment year 2019-2020 and that CPC’s processing had rejected the assessee’s claim on 29.05.2020. That being the case, we conclude that the impugned disallowance by way of sec.143(1)(a)(v) processing is not sustainable in law. We accordingly decline the Revenue’s vehement arguments seeking to revive the sec.80P disallowance herein to the tune of Rs.3,01,74,039/- in very terms. Ordered accordingly.
This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed in above terms.”
We thus adopt judicial consistency to reverse the learned lower authorities action disallowing assessee’s impugned deduction claim(s) by way of sec.143(1)(a)(v) processing in very terms. The assessee succeeds in it’s instant first
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026