Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.19720/2022 C/W WRIT PETITION No.19718/2022 (T-IT) IN W.P. NO.19720/2022
BETWEEN:
GANESH BABU S/O LATE Y.L.RAMAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 100FT. ROAD, KATTRIGUPPE, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085
… PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.ANNAMALAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1 . THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001
2 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7(1)(1) BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 119(2)(B) OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 DATED 15.06.2021 SENT THROUGH POST ON 19.07.2021 HEREIN REFERRED AS ANNEXURE-A AND PETITION DATED 05.02.2022 FILED ON 17.02.2022 HEREIN AFTER REFERRED AS ANNEXURE-B AND DISPOSE THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AND ETC.
IN W.P. NO.19718/2022
BETWEEN
GANESH BABU S/O LATE Y.L.RAMAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 100FT.ROAD, KATTRIGUPPE, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085 PAN AAUPB9368A ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.ANNAMALAI S., ADVOCATE)
AND 1 . THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001
2 . THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7(1)(1), BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA DIRECT THE R1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER U/S 119(2)(b) OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2017-18 DTD:15.06.2021 HEREIN REFERRED AS ANNEXURE-A AND PETITION DTD:05.02.2022 FILED ON 17.02.2022 HEREINAFTER REFERRED AS ANNEXURE-B AND DISPOSE OF THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISION OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In W.P.No.19720/2022, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to consider the petition filed by the petitioner under section 119(2)(b) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17 dated 15.06.2021 sent through post on 19.07.2021 herein referred as Annexure-A and petitioner dated 05.02.2022 filed on 17.02.2022 herein after referred as Annexure-B and dispose of the same in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
ii) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
In W.P.No.19718/2022, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ of mandamus or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner filed by the Petitioner under section 119(2)(b) of the Act for the assessment year 2017-18 dated: 15.06.2021 herein referred as Annexure-A and petition dated 05.02.2022 filed on 17.02.2022 hereinafter referred as Annexure-B and dispose of the same in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
ii) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.”
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
It is the grievance of the petitioner that his petitions at Annexures-A and B dated 15.06.2021 and 05.02.2022 respectively submitted to the 1st respondent have not been considered so far by the 1st respondent nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petitions.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, the 1st respondent would consider and pass necessary order on the said petitions at Annexures-A and B.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, the 1st respondent is hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioner and consider his petitions dated 15.06.2021 at Annexure-A and 05.02.2022 at Annexure-B in both the writ petitions and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid directions, the petitions stand disposed off.
SD/- JUDGE
PKS